Red One MX article and Ted @ Red Interview

[Jack Mosor]

Hey guys and gals,

Just would like to share this article with you by David Battistella, about Red One and New MX sensor, it also includes audio interview with Ted @ Red.

http://library.creativecow.net/batti...david/RED-MX/1

http://library.creativecow.net/batti...david/RED-MX/1

Nice job David

Cheers,

[Sanjin Jukic]

Thanks Jack and it's very good for the users with MX.

[R. Gonzales]

Thanks David,
An insightful piece.

Best

[Tom Gough]

Thanks for the heads up Jack

Nice work David!

Thanks for sharing :)

[David Battistella]

Thanks All.

Ted left a nice little bit of info on Proxy module intentions near the end of teh interview.

Many thanks to TED, JIM and JARRED and RED for their help on this as well.

David

[KETCH ROSSi]

Good article David.

[Kwan Khan]

This is really an informative article
Thanks to all

[Peter Moretti]

I'm really having a hard time getting my head around this "White balance after every new lighting setup" advice being given by Ted and Jim.

Most of the times you don't want white to be pure white. So other than a more general tungsten vs. daylight setting, I don't see the logic in white balancing before every setup.

I KNOW WB is only metadata, but Ted and Jim have been vocal proponents of frequent WBing. So it must have more importance than just potentially useless metadata that you'll probably just throwaway, and I'm just not getting it.

If anyone could care to shed any light (no pun intended) on this, I'm all ears (non sequitur intended, LOL!)?

[Jason Beckwith]

White balance:

http://reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?p=540713

Enjoy.

[Mark Pugh]

He seems to be saying that white balancing in Redcine-x is important, before exporting. He's not talking about white balancing in camera.