Thread: Red response to their customers need for 4k editing, color correcting, grading, etc

Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30
  1. #21  
    Hi Lucas,

    Great to see again too.

    I understand you are saying but from what I know, CineForm is not a "Quicktime" compatible codec at all. While REDCINE maybe GPU optimized, CineForm is not; rather it is highly CPU optimized. From what I know it is so highly specific that porting to another processor is all but impossible.

    I could be all wrong, but we don't really have to guess. This theory can easily be tested, CineForm has try out programs that can be downloaded. Is this something that you can test Lucas? I would be very interested in learning the outcome.

    Kevin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,962
    Quote Originally Posted by khmuse View Post
    CineForm is not a "Quicktime" compatible codec at all.
    Actually, Cineform added Quicktime and Intel Mac support so Lucas is correct to say "should" work.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    So, lets test this theory. I would love to be wrong about this one!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24  
    Senior Member Paul Leeming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    2,256
    Quote Originally Posted by joelnet View Post
    RedCine is GPU based, correct? If so, that would mean everyone will need a compatible card. Recommendations for good performance? Are we talking nVidia or AJA/Blackmagic?
    I do remember Rob Lohman stating that RedCine could take advantage of normal consumer Nvidia cards, which is good since I have a nice GeForce 8800GTX with 768MB of GDDR3 RAM sitting in my quad core box. :) Makes sense anyway since the far costlier Quadro series are actually identical hardware with different firmware ID and a different set of drivers optimised for slightly different tasks. Seems a waste of money to go the Quadro route in any modern software that doesn't require the videocard to output in HD-SDI or some other specialised form.

    HTH

    Paul
    Paul Leeming
    Writer/Director/Cinematographer/Stereographer
    Visceral Psyche Films

    www.visceralpsyche.com

    Mobile: +1 (415) 562-4433
    Twitter:
    @visceralpsyche

    Facebook: Paul Leeming

    Epic-X #135 (soon to be Epic DRAGON)

    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25  
    Senior Member Lauri Kettunen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    927
    Quote Originally Posted by joelnet View Post
    Actually, Cineform added Quicktime and Intel Mac support so Lucas is correct to say "should" work.
    This is my understanding as well, and as far as I understand this is not an issue. One should be able to create Cineform AVI files (using HDLink) from the output formats of Redcine including Quicktime files.

    Instead, the real issue is, will it be possible to convert Red 4K raw files to Cineform 4K raw files? If so, that would be remarkable and yield an amazing and highly cost effective workflow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26  
    Quote Originally Posted by khmuse View Post
    I understand you are saying but from what I know, CineForm is not a "Quicktime" compatible codec at all.
    Kevin
    Kevin,

    We been a QuickTime codec on the PC for nearly two years and a shipping QuickTime codec on the Intel Mac for about 4 months. We looking forward to any testing, unfortunately we don't have Redcine betas to do the testing ourselves.

    All,

    Generally we expect QuickTime exports to work fine. However, we will want to confirm that pixel formats are a match between RedCine the the CineForm codecs. The common deep 'b64a' format (16-bit per channel) is supported, yet on the PC the byte ordering is ambiguous, AE7 and Combustion use one byte order and AE CS3 uses the other. So we may need to tweak things for Redcine. Any information on the supported pixel formats in advance would be helpful. For of those lucky enough to have "access" we can prove 4K licences for testing purposes.
    David Newman
    CTO, CineForm
    http://twitter.com/David_Newman
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27  
    Hi David,

    Thanks for the correction. I guess I was working with out of date information about CineForm. Please PM me and we can discuss further testing. By the way, I do fully agree, the byte order problem is prevalent for many multi-platform applications.

    Kevin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Wellington, NZ
    Posts
    13
    Except that the 8800 series have Overlay disabled in hardware. This has proved to be a problem with using Cineform on the PC.

    http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=94164

    You can use the 7950 instead if you want to stick with consumer based cards. I use the Quadro FX4000 myself.

    Quote Originally Posted by visceralpsyche View Post
    I do remember Rob Lohman stating that RedCine could take advantage of normal consumer Nvidia cards, which is good since I have a nice GeForce 8800GTX with 768MB of GDDR3 RAM sitting in my quad core box. :) Makes sense anyway since the far costlier Quadro series are actually identical hardware with different firmware ID and a different set of drivers optimised for slightly different tasks. Seems a waste of money to go the Quadro route in any modern software that doesn't require the videocard to output in HD-SDI or some other specialised form.

    HTH

    Paul
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29  
    Quote Originally Posted by Lauri Kettunen View Post
    Why not this one:

    4K Raw -> Cineform 4K or 2K files -> Premiere Pro -> cut & use filters & transitions -> hit render, if needed and/or export to what ever format you like[...]

    Fine for some projects if you are happy to be limited to the Premiere/Avid in app grading tools.
    Gavin Greenwalt || im.thatoneguy
    im.thatoneguy[at]gmail.com | Straightface Studios | VFX & Animation
    Canon Scarlet-X package available to rent in Seattle, WA
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30  
    Quote Originally Posted by Dean Gough View Post
    Except that the 8800 series have Overlay disabled in hardware. This has proved to be a problem with using Cineform on the PC.

    http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=94164

    You can use the 7950 instead if you want to stick with consumer based cards. I use the Quadro FX4000 myself.
    Can someone fill me in on the details of what that means. I have a 8800GTX coming in the mail. Is video overlay no longer an option, and is it still available on the new QuadroFX4600? That would be a big disappointment.
    I can understand why Nvidia would do that, from a business perspective, but it would be a real bummer.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts