This might have already been mentioned before, but just in case you missed it... http://www.cipa.jp/english/pdf/071001.pdf
|
|
10-08-2007, 05:35 PM
This might have already been mentioned before, but just in case you missed it... http://www.cipa.jp/english/pdf/071001.pdf
10-09-2007, 04:57 AM
Good find Lowkus.
The English on that pdf is atrocious - a great example of making something unnecessarily hard to read and understand!
So as I understand it, Red Ones would "be deemed as Video Camera Recorders (Camcorders)". That's probably a bad thing in terms of making it more expensive to import into the EU? Dang it! :-(
10-09-2007, 06:37 AM
It says this applies only to cameras where the duration of a single sequential video recording is 30 minutes or more. With 8 GB CF recording this criterion is not met. So it's simply a "digital camera" and not a "camcorder".
10-09-2007, 07:23 AM
Hmmm. Good luck with that! :clown2:Originally Posted by big lebowski
It says this applies only to cameras where the duration of a single sequential video recording is 30 minutes or more. With 8 GB CF recording this criterion is not met. So it's simply a "digital camera" and not a "camcorder".
10-09-2007, 07:31 AM
Actually, as we are splitting the R3D files on a 2GB chunk, max sequential record time is much less still.... Depending on how you want to play the definition game.
Graeme
10-09-2007, 07:33 AM
do you know the import duty on a camcorder?
10-09-2007, 05:57 PM
Haha, we're all counting on you to know that Rory.
Paul
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
