Trust me... the outside would be blown to smithereens with any other camera.
Jim
|
|
Trust me... the outside would be blown to smithereens with any other camera.
Jim
I dont know how to express my technical delight at how 'normal' this looks - given it should look either a) horrible or b) look extremely fake.
This is an exceptional technical achievement and will change to the core the nature of cinematography. Seriously, this will alter how you light. I say this not from a "gosh wow red you rock" pov - this will technically alter the balance of on set to post production lighting decisions - shifting some key creative technical decisions later in the process.
But again while I *know* that to be true - I cant get past this shot for it 'normal properties'. I am stunned at how 'unprocessed' and 'real' this looks (given it is so new and previously impossible/difficult). This is a HUGE technical achievement. Congrats to the team (for producing such a normal looking shot - if that makes sense?).
Mike
I believe that the scientific term for this much dynamic range is ridonkulous.
Rather amazing. I guess in this case the color temperature is quite different indoors and outdoors. Did you need to do anything special to make the interior and exterior to match this well?
I'm personally having a hard time imagining as to how dark or how bright it really was in person just because I'm not used to seeing such a clean image come out of a camera.
For the next HDRx preview, can we get a snap shot from another camera to get an idea of how a typical camera would react or a non HDRx version shot with the same RED? just a thought.
Great job. Though I'm not a pro (still a student), I wish such a feature would come to ALL cameras. It definitely is setting a new standard in the industry.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |