Thread: Candles in Manhattan

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 49
  1. #11  
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry McKee View Post
    Mark, what ASA rating did you use for this shot?
    500 - opened up the shutter
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    So shutters more than 180 are enabled now? Is the shutter close to 1/24 ? I know it can't go all the way to a 360 degree shutter, because there is some minimum readout time, but does it get close?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    REDuser Sponsor Brook Willard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    5,230
    If memory serves, a 1/24 shutter is possible. I feel like I've selected that option before.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Looks great ! Let us have more !
    Frank Mirbach "Jones"
    Director/D.O.P.

    RED ONE MX No. 2560 EPIC X No. 1319

    MINEWORKS FILM - www.mineworks.de
    REAL BUDDY MOVIE - www.real-buddy.com
    SHOWREEL at www.frankmirbach.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Okay I can't figure out this low light stuff there seems to be a great disparity that I am seeing between cameras. The low light stuff showcased in Chicago was pretty bad when pushed to even 500ASA it had loads of grain about on kill with the viper and exhibited some REAL BAD NOISE in the blue channel. I'm having a hard time rationalizing the difference in performance I'm seeing. I have seen some clean footage and some REALLY BAD grainy footage. Ideas???
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Quote Originally Posted by LighthouseMEdia View Post
    Okay I can't figure out this low light stuff there seems to be a great disparity that I am seeing between cameras. The low light stuff showcased in Chicago was pretty bad when pushed to even 500ASA it had loads of grain about on kill with the viper and exhibited some REAL BAD NOISE in the blue channel. I'm having a hard time rationalizing the difference in performance I'm seeing. I have seen some clean footage and some REALLY BAD grainy footage. Ideas???

    POST PRODUCTION
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    hmmm this was James Matthers footage, and I was just really very suprised how quickly it developed noise when pushed to 500 let alone 1000 or higher.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Mark...Oh Mark! You are amazing, I think I love you and your beautiful pictures...Keep em coming!!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Quote Originally Posted by LighthouseMEdia View Post
    hmmm this was James Matthers footage, and I was just really very suprised how quickly it developed noise when pushed to 500 let alone 1000 or higher.
    do you know exactly how the footage was "processed"?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    It's really amazing the diffrence between well processed and poorly processed Red images.
    "All art is deception."

    My DP reel...
    http://www.evingrantdp.com
    http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
    360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
    http://www.360dop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts