Thread: Best Quality Hardware or software downconverter?

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1 Best Quality Hardware or software downconverter? 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    730
    I want to produce the best H264 SD or DVD SD as possible out from my HD masters in SCRATCH ,so the first step for sure is a good Scaling downconversion ,
    so
    Speaking quality of scaling (nor artifacts and as sharper as possible)

    which one of this products can be consider an high quality downconverter like the scaling quality of decks like D5 or SR?

    Teranex Mini
    Aja HD10MD3
    Aja Kona 3
    Blackmagic upcrossdown
    Bluefish Epoc (whit jet stream module for downconversion)

    or

    Any Top end quality software solution?

    Thanks a lot

    g
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    730
    bump...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,149
    Try This, Id be interested to see how it compares with other processes youve tried.

    Use Apple Compressor. 3 or later.
    Enable Frame controls and set up suitable parameters for down convert. ie size etc. (Theres not a huge difference in the 'better 'and 'best' options for spacial down convert.) This component is the same high quality component used in HSake which is very good.

    Download the X264 QT encoder component and install. (just google for it and you'll find it. Set up suitable parameters in the X264 encoder, this isnt easy but give it a go, we may have some presents we could mail you if needed.

    Hope it works out.

    Dave
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    730
    thanks dave ,

    but i've used compressor with frame control many many times , so far i can say that is better than a Kona LHe (and Kona 3 and blackmagic chep converter ...)

    i think that the teranex and decks (and even teh bluefish )should do a better job...the problems on this cheap solutions is the aliasing on the edges ...

    i am sure somewhere must be a software that does a great job , great as decks...

    g
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    946
    If speed is your concern then you need hardware, but often software can be higher quality, although there are three basic types of software downsampling

    a) software that aims for pure speed at the expense of quality
    a) software that makes a compromise between quality and speed
    b) and software that can focus purely on quality output

    Ask yourself this: Is output quality better with or without a rocket?

    If you think DRX can improve your image, then the answer is "without", as its too complex for the redrocket hardware... the beauty of non-realtime software is, it can be as complex as you like.

    I wrote my own downsampler for image sequences ( and recently added the ability to encode to DCI jpeg2000 files as output). I don't think anyone really "got it". It can downsample anything, regardless of footage subject or resolution. Its all floating point beauty

    eg, 28k epic stock footage of herring bones caught in a spiders web -> CIF (176X144 pixels) lol! .. no problem.

    I'm personally not obsessed wth speed, you may not have the luxury. That said, the bottle neck with my system now is almost purely disk I/O speed/space, not the algorithm itself.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Johnny Friday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    La Paz, Baja Ca. Sur, Mexico
    Posts
    2,983
    i use MXO2LE with MAX technology. the MAX is there H264 hardware encoder that give some really nice H264 looks and its blazing fast. I use it DAILY.
    John Friday
    La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico
    www.bajaproductions.com

    EPIC M & 2X for 3d & Deep Epic Underwater Housing
    RED MX with SSD & Underwater Housing
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    730
    Thanks conrad ,
    speed it's not an issue for me , i want quality when i have to deliver a job As DVD ...

    Is Your software on the market?
    Any chance to' try it ?

    Ps:johhny ,i di have the matrox max encoder ,and i agree, for h364 is really great...

    G
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriele Turchi View Post
    Thanks conrad ,
    speed it's not an issue for me , i want quality when i have to deliver a job As DVD ...

    Is Your software on the market?
    Any chance to' try it ?

    G
    I believe I have an already compiled version suitable for dvd output. Its Windows software though. It runs on anything..and I mean anything (ie, windows 3.1 with win32s installed.. which hopefully means nothing to you)

    It loads image sequences, downsamples them at full quality (floating point), then outputs as 8bit bmps or pngs (perfect for dvd, which is what I used it for). It doesn't suffer from out of phase patterns on shirts etc

    My newer version would need digging/sorting out a bit (GUI-wise, it needs making more user friendly). It differs from the above version in that it can load and export more formats by calling/using third party commandline tools, and can output 16bit images. I'm not editing at the moment, just renting gear and playing guitar so development has/had been paused.

    pm me your email if you want the dvd version

    UPDATE: Heres a basic GUI for some tests I've been doing. Output goes into same folder as source images, as do temporary files. I've only enabed TIFF input and output at the moment, and they are read and written as 48bit files. Its the result of a busy night this week. It can read and write most formats either internally, or using external tools, when I enable it.. when I get time.

    There is a large test chart (uncompressed TIFF) in the program folder. Move it to another folder and process that folder using the default output sizes (273x341 I think, 1/100 the size of the aforementioned TIFF) and process. No go try the same resample in PhotoshopCS4/ AfterEffects etc. I did ;)

    here's the link:

    www.northyorkshirecamerahire.com/tds48bit.zip
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member Leo Ticheli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    816
    I went through this quite a while ago and tried every software and hardware solution I could find; in the end I discovered a rather unlikely solution, the Panasonic DVCPro HD deck. No kidding; this produced the best looking down-conversions. If you have an old one lying around, give it a try; just run the signal through the electronics.

    I think Kona and Black Magic do a good job these days.

    Good shooting and best regards,

    Leo
    Leo Ticheli
    Director/Cinematographer
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by Leo Ticheli View Post
    I went through this quite a while ago and tried every software and hardware solution I could find; in the end I discovered a rather unlikely solution, the Panasonic DVCPro HD deck. No kidding; this produced the best looking down-conversions. If you have an old one lying around, give it a try; just run the signal through the electronics.

    I think Kona and Black Magic do a good job these days.

    Good shooting and best regards,

    Leo
    i offered you mine but you weren't interested! The guy wants quality. not speed. Hardware doesn't come close. I can't wait for 9k/28k+ footage to arrive
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts