Thread: Need Help - Tons of motion blur on very minimal movement Red MX footage

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1. #1 Need Help - Tons of motion blur on very minimal movement Red MX footage 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    27
    Hey guys, I shot a music video on Saturday on my Red MX and for the first time experienced a problem with motion blur.

    There is NOT extensive motion.. I realize with a lot of big movements, blur is inevitable.. but even on my close up shots of the singers face, just him simply moving his head side to side goes blurry / smeary out of focus, whatever you want to call it.

    I shot a bunch of stuff in 2k 48 frames, and that does not have the problem. However all of the 4K 24 fps footage, whether it is wide, medium or close up, has this motion blur problem.

    I am told by my camera crew ( i was director ) that we used the exact same settings we always have in the past and they are stumped as to why this happened.

    Any ideas as to what could have caused this, and secondly, if there's ANY way to fix it at all?

    I've attached a picture example of a close up, just so you know it's minimal movement...when he's basically STILL, the picture is perfect.

    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    The problem looks like shutter angle/exposure time. Probably using 1/24 th at 24 frames or in other words a 360 degree shutter. When you switched to 48 frames of course the shutter speed would of been at least 1/48th of a sec.
    Unfortunately no way to fix it that I know of.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    515
    Quote Originally Posted by Marcus Struzina View Post
    The problem looks like shutter angle/exposure time. Probably using 1/24 th at 24 frames or in other words a 360 degree shutter. When you switched to 48 frames of course the shutter speed would of been at least 1/48th of a sec.
    Unfortunately no way to fix it that I know of.
    Might be - hard to say from a single frame. Could also be that there's nothing wrong with the footage, other than the asker noticing the motion blur (which is not an error) for the first time. The individual frames are NOT supposed to look sharp really...
    Eki Halkka (a.k.a. Halsu)
    Freelance Jack-Of-All-Trades
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Eki Halkka View Post
    Might be - hard to say from a single frame. Could also be that there's nothing wrong with the footage, other than the asker noticing the motion blur (which is not an error) for the first time. The individual frames are NOT supposed to look sharp really...
    Please check my thread on DVXUSER as well for more still grabs... it's not just in the stills, its very noticeable when watching the video..

    http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread...93#post2179693
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    27
    Here is what I found on the camera report for that shot in particular that u see in the still frame:

    Lens - 100
    Stop - 4
    No Dolly
    Shutter - 1/48
    ISO - 800
    FPS - 24

    Does this make any difference to your conclusions?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Washington DC Metro Area
    Posts
    2,015
    I concur. It looks like excessive motion blur.

    I have the same guess as everyone else here, the shutter was too open/slow, possible 360°.

    If that's the case, you can try to sharpen in post... but I wouldn't hold out much hope. That's definitely a counsel of desperation. There are some other post tricks you can try, but that will probably lead to more expense that a reshoot with dubious results. Again, a counsel of desperation.

    My only trouble is that 360° doesn't normally look that blurry if the subject is as still as claimed. Just for sanity I did a quick shot with a 7D at 1080/24p 1/30 shutter... far sharper than this image or the ones I see on DVXuser.

    The subject was most likely moving faster than you thought.

    There may be other contributing factors... for example if there is a post accumulate or motion blur added.

    You should post the a portion of an r3d file that is exhibiting this problem, so that users here can see the problem in motion in original media.

    I really think the problem is on set. Its prudent to eliminate all the other potential issues before making that determination.

    If it does turn out to be an on set issue, then you should plan on a reshoot.
    Alexander Ibrahim
    Director & DP
    editing/color correction/compositing/effects
    http://www.alexanderibrahim.net
    http://www.zenera.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Gunleik Groven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    9,230
    From that single frame, it's not possible to judge anything, really...

    It makes sense that the 2k has less motionblur, thoughif it was set at relative shutter...
    Life is good. So is RED...
    STUFF Now part II is out! Check it here:
    http://youtu.be/mhFB1CMzQBM
    http://igg.me/at/stuff/x/2338831
    http://bit.ly/mCwcoN
    Twitter: gunleik

    I am open for consulting, work and travel all over, really. Just PM me...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander Ibrahim View Post
    I concur. It looks like excessive motion blur.

    I have the same guess as everyone else here, the shutter was too open/slow, possible 360°.

    If that's the case, you can try to sharpen in post... but I wouldn't hold out much hope. That's definitely a counsel of desperation. There are some other post tricks you can try, but that will probably lead to more expense that a reshoot with dubious results. Again, a counsel of desperation.

    My only trouble is that 360° doesn't normally look that blurry if the subject is as still as claimed. Just for sanity I did a quick shot with a 7D at 1080/24p 1/30 shutter... far sharper than this image or the ones I see on DVXuser.

    The subject was most likely moving faster than you thought.

    There may be other contributing factors... for example if there is a post accumulate or motion blur added.

    You should post the a portion of an r3d file that is exhibiting this problem, so that users here can see the problem in motion in original media.

    I really think the problem is on set. Its prudent to eliminate all the other potential issues before making that determination.

    If it does turn out to be an on set issue, then you should plan on a reshoot.
    ok, seeing the video for yourself is a good idea, but how do i post an r3d file? i can upload a portion of a clip i've log and transfered to apple pro res 422 hq, is that okay? to youtube?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Washington DC Metro Area
    Posts
    2,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Alison Parker View Post
    Here is what I found on the camera report for that shot in particular that u see in the still frame:

    Lens - 100
    Stop - 4
    No Dolly
    Shutter - 1/48
    ISO - 800
    FPS - 24

    Does this make any difference to your conclusions?
    Not really.

    Camera reports can be mistaken.

    That report doesn't jive with your claim that there was a lot of light in the scene. That exposure would call for 24 candles of light, which is about what a computer monitor displaying a white screen puts out at 8 inches

    Post the r3d.
    Alexander Ibrahim
    Director & DP
    editing/color correction/compositing/effects
    http://www.alexanderibrahim.net
    http://www.zenera.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander Ibrahim View Post
    Not really.

    Camera reports can be mistaken.

    That report doesn't jive with your claim that there was a lot of light in the scene. That exposure would call for 24 candles of light, which is about what a computer monitor displaying a white screen puts out at 8 inches

    Post the r3d.
    for sure I will post the r3d file but how do i do it?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts