Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Makeup showing up with greenish hue

Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 81
  1. #31  
    Senior Member Jeff Coatney's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Fushun, China
    Posts
    1,490
    Quote Originally Posted by axel ebermann View Post
    It is indeed important. The question though is really what is happening here.
    Just avoiding one particular brand of makeup will not solve it.

    - is there a relation to the color spectrum of the light source (tungsten, flou, daylight) ?
    - might the make up add green or block magenta ?
    - does it have something to do with certain digital sensors ?
    - or a weird combination of all of the above ?

    Makeup brand was rcma Shinto by the way.
    True. But until that is understood, the most expedient method is to remove the known defective element from the process.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #32  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,287
    I'm wondering if this is an Infra-Red pollution issue - have you tried putting an Infra-Red cut filter in front of the lens to see if this cures the problem.

    On my MacBook Pro screen I'm having difficulty seeing the greenish hue in the attached pictures though. Are your screens calibrated/adjusted to final output?
    Director/Digital Camera Operator/2nd AC/DIT/Data Manager
    London, UK.

    Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #33  
    Senior Member Jeff Coatney's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Fushun, China
    Posts
    1,490
    I've reached out to the manufacturer of the make-up brand for help in quantifying this issue. I'll keep you posted. I'm sure they have as much in the game as anyone and will be willing to work to resolve this. BTW, cosmetic manufacturing undergoes rigorous spectrographic analysis for color under a wide variance of color-temperatures before and after production. Its possible that a contaminated batch, or contaminated product could be a cause. But its important to isolate the offending specimen for re-qualification by the factory QC dept. This could also be product counterfeiting.
    Last edited by Jeff Coatney; 02-25-2011 at 10:55 AM. Reason: Expanding text.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #34  
    Senior Member paulherrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Johnson City, TN
    Posts
    2,481
    how about a timelapse test of applying the makeup, and perhaps changing lights between daylight/tungsten/gelled along the way.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #35  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by paulherrin View Post
    lose the makeup. never liked the stuff anyway.
    You're kidding right?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #36  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Coatney View Post
    I've reached out to the manufacturer of the make-up brand for help in quantifying this issue. I'll keep you posted. I'm sure they have as much in the game as anyone and will be willing to work to resolve this. BTW, cosmetic manufacturing undergoes rigorous spectrographic analysis for color under a wide variance of color-temperatures before and after production. Its possible that a contaminated batch, or contaminated product could be a cause. But its important to isolate the offending specimen for re-qualification by the factory QC dept. This could also be product counterfeiting.
    We've had thsi problem and foudn the makeup artist bought off an anauthorized ebay reseller who was flogging cheap counterfeit. It ended up in a complex lawsuit.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #37  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    479
    Hey Clint (fellow Brooklynite :-)

    Couple of good points. I know the whole tungsten green issue.
    But that it shows up so much in the makeup is new...

    Already realized that I will have to shoot a test...

    Thanks


    Axel


    Quote Originally Posted by A. Clint Litton View Post
    I've been seeing a lot of green cast overall in skintones on a project I've been working on lately...primarily shooting in tungsten settings. It's not shot in a completely controlled studio environment, but there have been many times that we're only using tungsten units, nothing from location. Oftentimes the lights are on dimmers and brought down from full intensity.

    Anything shot outside doesn't require such a tint adjustment, if any, at least based on what RC-X is showing me in conjunction with a Macbeth.

    As I mentioned, some of the stuff we're shooting is in really dimly lit environments, and I'm finding that the eyedropper WB in RC-X shows a pretty big shift in tint towards green. There definitely seems to be a correlation with tint/green as we go warmer/lower in the kelvin spectrum.

    I've considered that it could have something to do with the individual fixtures we're using (a lot of Mole 1k and 2k zips) and perhaps the wear/life of the bulbs within those fixtures, but these results seem to be happening across the board, independent of any specific units we're using.

    My thought is that this may have something to do with the bayer pattern design of the sensor, being that half the photosites read green and the other half are split between red and blue...this, in conjunction with using less light as some do with MX, and, given the better response under tungsten than early M, and thereby not gelling lights or using and 80-series filter to correct closer to the sensor's native balance, could mean there's going to be a more prominent shift in tint, especially in the shadows/underexposed areas.

    I haven't had an opportunity to do extensive testing of this notion, and I don't know that this theory would completely explain what you all are seeing, but a quick and dirty way to better determine this on your end could be:

    - Shoot someone in makeup and someone without the makeup side-by-side under the tungsten lighting scenario you've been using, then compare in RC-X and along the post pipeline.

    - Put an 80C or 80D in front of the lens and shoot the same person/same makeup/same lighting and see if that changes anything with regards to green/tint on faces, especially in the underexposed areas.

    Without a doubt, Red has come a long way from the early days shooting under tungsten...I'm just wondering if, by virtue of having the extra MX performance, we're getting lazier (for lack of a better word) with our lighting in giving the sensor what it needs?

    It may be a combination of these things (starving sensor & how pro make-up interacts with tungsten source lighting) that is contributing to this. Either way, it's questions/issues like these that make the value of this forum and its user-base really known.

    Thanks all for your contributions.

    Best,
    Clint
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #38  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    479
    it shows on all monitors across the board (we do work with calibrated monitors)

    Infrared filter - hmmm - very easy test so definitely worth it.
    bottom line is i guess that I need to do a test as nobody seems to have a definite answer.

    it is pretty much impossible to do test on set with top talent in front of the
    camera and 10 agency people worrying in video village...

    Quote Originally Posted by ericyoung View Post
    I'm wondering if this is an Infra-Red pollution issue - have you tried putting an Infra-Red cut filter in front of the lens to see if this cures the the problem.

    On my MacBook Pro screen I'm having difficulty seeing the greenish hue in the attached pictures though. Are your screens calibrated/adjusted to final output?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #39  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    479
    Yikes. I would pretty much rule that out in our case though
    because we know our make up artists and they are legit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Ruffo View Post
    We've had thsi problem and foudn the makeup artist bought off an anauthorized ebay reseller who was flogging cheap counterfeit. It ended up in a complex lawsuit.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #40  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    479
    I wrote them an email too. No response so far so please keep me posted.
    I think the make up needs to be involved in some way - because this is where the problem shows up...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Coatney View Post
    I've reached out to the manufacturer of the make-up brand for help in quantifying this issue. I'll keep you posted. I'm sure they have as much in the game as anyone and will be willing to work to resolve this. BTW, cosmetic manufacturing undergoes rigorous spectrographic analysis for color under a wide variance of color-temperatures before and after production. Its possible that a contaminated batch, or contaminated product could be a cause. But its important to isolate the offending specimen for re-qualification by the factory QC dept. This could also be product counterfeiting.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts