Thread: Nikon "G" 1.4 primes, a mini review...

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 99
  1. #11  
    Quote Originally Posted by Julio Quintana View Post
    Thanks for the review Evin. I guess there are two pieces that would make these an obvious choice over their Canon counterparts:

    1. Estimated availability of the Nikon mount for Epic
    2. Availability of the Redmote Pro and its viability as a decent wireless follow focus (to negate the reverse focus gear issue)

    Jarred?
    Of course these are the questions, but I do think that Red is on it. I will still be using my Optimo DPs for most cinema work, but for light weight/location work the new Nikkors offer some real compelling options.
    "All art is deception."

    My DP reel...
    http://www.evingrantdp.com
    http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
    360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
    http://www.360dop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    789
    Thanks for the pics Evin. Great shots!

    Does your Nikon do moving images? In other words, can you test breathing/image shift with these lenses?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member Sanjin Jukic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    8,710
    Thanks Evin for a nice images!

    Then I was also counting on that fast Nikon G prime combo...

    Just in a case if you have more time to do a kind of second part of your test at more convenient situations with low and available light something

    like a car inside shot during a night drive, ordinary street night shot that could involve a mix of many lights from cars, streetlight vapor and neon, night cityscape, etc,...

    Only in that sort of test we could see possible lens aberrations (mostly coma, chromatic aberration, diverse flares, light bubbles and ghosting, etc...).

    Why?

    Because shooting dogs or girlfriends in a way doesn't tell us something more about a quality of any lens wide open.
    "There is no point in having sharp images when you've fuzzy ideas."
    Jean-Luc Godard.

    Dynamic range is, after all, the measurement between well saturation (photosite blowout) and noise floor.
    Thom Hogan


    --------

    500px >>>
    Twitter >>>
    Facebook >>>
    Vimeo >>>
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member Richard Foster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    USA, Caribbean, England
    Posts
    654
    Agreed, Jacek and Larry. Nikon makes awesome glass.
    Richard Foster
    http://www.fosterent.com
    RED MX #1058 "Secretariat"

    If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. - Einstein

    Carpe Diem
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member Elsie N's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    3,003
    Thanks for this Evin. I have the 50mm 1.4 G in my Amazon cart already. Your review clinches it for me.
    One camera is a shoot... two or more is a production.
    L.C. (Elsie) N., omniographer.com, dba nelloProductions, LLC (soon)...looks like a good time to start a business.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member AnthonyFlores's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hollywood, CA
    Posts
    1,321
    Thanks Evin. You mentioned the M series ... but have you evaluated the Leica Summilux-R 35, 50, and 80mm? How do they compare? Another stellar wide open performer I hear is the entire Leica S line, though they are "slow" in the 35mm realm at only f2.5 ... but for MF lenses they are super fast and everything I've heard about them (including the charts) speaks to them being some of the best still lenses ever made. Their downsides, apart from speed, are limited range of focal lengths, insane price ($5-7,000 per lens) and scarce availability.

    Anyway, thanks again for posting this, I always thought Canon L glass was superior to Nikon and was going to go with Canon glass on the Epic, but now you've pretty much convinced me to go with this set whenever I need AF lenses.

    I hope these can be obtained given all that's going on with supply for high-end camera gear.

    Anthony
    Anthony Flores
    Writer - Marketer - Director

    "The film industry is about saying ‘no’ to people,
    and inherently you cannot take ‘no’ for an answer."

    - James Cameron
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Justen Nguyen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    319
    Thanks again for the review Evin! I always love reading your thoughts/review.
    I'd also be interested in your thoughts on the Leica R's. Though I think Anthony is confused as the 'summilux' denotes f1.4's as the largest aperture. I do believe the he's referring to the "elmarit's". In either case I've been interested in getting leicas, I'm sure we've all heard of the van diemen lenses that were converted from leicas.
    There's just something about a manual aperture (built into the lens) that does it for me.

    But all in all I've always loved Nikon glass. I use ai-s lenses on my 7d haha
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member Shane Betts's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Oz
    Posts
    1,491
    Thanks Evin. I have a serious love affair with Nikon glass - even if I'm sorta trapped into Canon right now. You know, looking at that little lineup, it occurs to me that, with the addition of another two or three fast lenses, Nikon could have a worthy set of alternative primes on it's hands. Red's new cameras open this stuff up even more to motion work. Come on Nikon. Give us a 14, 18 and a 135 at 1.4. I double dog dare ya!
    Cheers
    Bettsy
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member Julio Quintana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Shane Betts View Post
    Come on Nikon. Give us a 14, 18 and a 135 at 1.4. I double dog dare ya!
    Oh man. If ANY still lens manufacturer would produce those focal lengths at f1.4, it would be very difficult for me to justify buying cinema glass for the DSMC cameras.
    Julio Quintana
    www.juliomquintana.com

    EPIC-X #560
    Canon Lens Package-
    -11-16mm f2.8
    -16-35mm f2.8
    -24mm f1.4
    -35mm f1.4
    -50mm f1.2
    -85mm f1.2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    I'd be happy if they just did the "G" treatment to the already stellar 105 and 135mm F2 DC lenses. As for a 14 or 18mm I'm perfectly happy with the 14-24, at those wide focal lengths 2.8 is fine for me.

    I've not had much experience with Leica R lenses but from what I've seen they are also stellar performers but considerably bigger than the M series lenses. Same with the S line, extraordinary performance but I had a hard enough time affording my M9 kit, an S2 is just a little out of my range with Epic coming.
    "All art is deception."

    My DP reel...
    http://www.evingrantdp.com
    http://www.YouTube.com/evingrant
    360º Cinematography and camera rigs...
    http://www.360dop.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts