|
|
The question is what have they decided to replace its functionality with.
Maybe there is an upcoming interface more like Quantel, Smoke or maybe there is something new.
Look ... there are a lot of people complaining about the iMovie like appearance and functionality. Well I tried iMovie recently, its pretty cool and a lot of fun to use. Of course its limiting in terms of what you can do ... but its cool - even fun to use, so long as what you want to do fits in its limitations.
I don't think that suddenly Final Cut Pro is suddenly going to have all the inane limitations of iMovie - in fact Apple sort of demonstrated that they had the toolset that covers a lot of what editors do.
Unlimited menory!!!! Lol
Thanks Marky ; )
Has potential... I'm just hoping that it does floating-point bit depth for colour grading. The "One-click-shot-to-shot balancing" seems like it could be amazing; hopefully you can just select two matching colours (say, the same shirt) from shot to shot and then it balances the entire thing.
FCP X sounds very promising.
Great advanced features, speed and metadata support.
I'll wait for my judgement after I work with it.
I hope they release more info on the rest of the studio soon.
The lack of it is driving some ppl nuts...
$300?! I thought iMovie was free!
I love that yesterday everyone was bagging FCP because it wasn' t as fast, today they're bagging it because the interface that none of them have tried sucks. So the more complex looking interface is the better app? Let's wait till there's more details eh? At least they've done something!
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |