Thunderbolt ie mac.
We have no PC's at all.
|
|
09-06-2011, 03:46 AM
Thunderbolt ie mac.
We have no PC's at all.
09-06-2011, 04:30 AM
+1 for thunderbolt
09-06-2011, 04:32 AM
both
09-06-2011, 04:48 AM
USB3 for us PC guys please.
Peter
09-06-2011, 05:51 AM
...and 9600 baud 9-pin serial ports for the nostalgic types.
:-)
09-06-2011, 10:19 AM
USB3.0 for convenience and speed. It can replace the USB2.0 port already on the Station modules.
SATA is still faster, so....
Thunderbolt would be nice too...
I'm all about options. :)
Personally I share Intel's opinion of USB3.0 (it's crap), but hey, it's out there and people are using it, it's backward compatible, so why not? I have a Mac Pro with a CalDigit 6GU3 card which gives 2x 6G SATA ports and 2x USB3 ports. So, I would probably use the USB3 on either Mac or PC. But would still connect to SATA in most situations. I can use the USB port to power the Station module if I don't want to wrestle the AC adapters or don't have the Station base handy.
09-06-2011, 10:31 AM
Thunderbolt wont be slow for a while and when adapters come out no other ports should be needed
09-06-2011, 10:37 AM
Definitely thunderbolt! I still find it amazing that no one that I am aware of has made a thunderbolt>eSATA adapter......
09-06-2011, 10:44 AM
PC-only here. I think it makes sense to have both USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt in future devices, but please don't lose eSATA.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
