Thread: Epic + Canon + (Which Filters)

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cairo-Egypt
    Posts
    443
    I own the 24, 32, 85, and 70-200. I've used the 24-70 a lot and i think it's nowhere near as sharp as the primes. It's not a very good lens for the price.
    Epic M owner #01129
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    276
    Thanks Mohamed. At this point I will get the primes and the 70-200. Once the X arrives, I can do some testing with 24-70 to see if it will work for me. Want to get a complete Canon set filled out - primes and zooms, then branch off to a new set of RPP's. Really appreciate the help and advice here guys, thnaks.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    I completely disagree with Mark P.

    We positively LOVE the 50mm f1.2L and use it wide open all the time. And I mean ALL the time. There must be an issue with his particular lens, as our copy is glorious wide-open and otherwise. In fact, it (and our 85mm f1.2L) is our single favorite lens!

    Stephen
    RED One M-X "Lewis" (#791)
    First feature film, Works in Progress, out on DVD (Vanguard Cinema).
    Second feature film, Terminal, now in post-production in Kansas City and scheduled for a late 2013 release.
    Third feature film, Dust, currently in pre-production and scheduled for production during summer 2014.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Now, with respect to ND filters, you will need to make sure you have IR+ND. And since you are using DSLR lenses, you will need to avoid the Pancro IR+ND filters, as these NDs are notorious for producing wicked ghosts when using some DSLR lenses. We used to have Pancros and had to sell them because of this issue (they were unusable). We went with Formatt IR+ND filters, and have not had a single ghost since.

    Ours are Panavision size (4x5.65) and, yes, they are expensive.

    Stephen
    RED One M-X "Lewis" (#791)
    First feature film, Works in Progress, out on DVD (Vanguard Cinema).
    Second feature film, Terminal, now in post-production in Kansas City and scheduled for a late 2013 release.
    Third feature film, Dust, currently in pre-production and scheduled for production during summer 2014.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member Mark Phelan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,849
    I've never had an issue with ghosting using the Pancros, which lenses caused problems for you Stephen?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Hi there, Mark.

    The ghosting issue with Pancros and DSLR lenses is well-established by many DSLR lens users on this forum. We experienced SEVERE ghosting with every Nikon lens we owned. It rendered the Pancro filters completely unusable. Apparently, some lens coatings are much more susceptible to ghosting with Pancros than others. There are many fewer reports of ghosting when using PL mount lenses (although there are some). There are no reports of ghosting with Formatt IR+ND filters to our knowledge and we have been unable to even make a ghost when we tried when using the Formatts. The difference, as they say, was night and day.

    Stephen
    RED One M-X "Lewis" (#791)
    First feature film, Works in Progress, out on DVD (Vanguard Cinema).
    Second feature film, Terminal, now in post-production in Kansas City and scheduled for a late 2013 release.
    Third feature film, Dust, currently in pre-production and scheduled for production during summer 2014.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member Josh Beadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SoCali
    Posts
    1,881
    The 24-70 has very little breathing from the tests I have seen.

    I use the Singh-Ray range of filters. They have a killer Variable ND which is ideal for knocking down ambient

    http://www.singh-ray.com/
    Josh
    Epic-M 1388 aka "Black Sheep"
    ATV FamFun

    It's not your camera's fault:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJm2EGNIod0&feature=related
    "Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst"
    Henri Cartier-Bresson

    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    276
    Thanks for input guys, really appreciate the help here. I have read conflicting reports about the need for the IR + ND - the M needed it where the MX and the Epic didn't need it due to a change in the internal camera filter. Any thoughts on this?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    503
    HOYA ND and PL filters and HD protectors when filters are not used (the best and still well priced).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Senior Member Stacey Spears's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Sammamish, WA
    Posts
    1,106
    I have been using the Formatt screw-on Hot Mirrow / ND filters (0.6, 0.9, and 1.2) with good results. They ship from the UK and sometimes takes several weeks to receive, depending on stock. If you are using screw-on filters, you may also want to get a push-on lens cap to use with them. For my 77mm filters, I use the 80mm Kaiser. I just orderd some 82mm filters and the 85mm Kaiser.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts