Umm Apple a little help please!

[Chris Forbes]

Might work, I'd love to see how they blend the edges.

[Jeff Kilgroe]

The above pixel-blaster wall panel systems are using multiple projectors - similar to mersive. Multiple projected sources piece together to make a single giant screen, rear projection style too...

[Rob Lohman]

That is the Sony 4K projector being displayed there. It already does 4K ;-)

[Blair S. Paulsen]

Sony's 4k SXRD based projector is the bomb but it is big and expensive - also overkill for a grading suite where you wouldn't need a 30' wide image. I am intrigued by the idea of using 4 1080p projectors driven by a Mac and the Mersive interface. There are some pretty impressive projectors hitting the market these days for prices between $3K and $7K.

[Gregory Karydis]

meh, it may not be 4K but you can use 2 of them but these are way better suited for the task http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=430

[Martin Drew]

I think the T221 has a bit too much lag for motion, it is more suited to still image work.

M

[Jeff Kilgroe]

I think the T221 has a bit too much lag for motion, it is more suited to still image work.

It does have serious motion issues. Probably one of the reasons it's no longer in production. Hopefully we'll see more high-res panels soon. I'd love to see LCD panels get about a 50% boost in density. Then we could have a 32" 4K display. Samsung and others have shown 4K panels at 46" sizes and larger, but these are just big panels with no more pixel density than what's available now in current displays.

[Chris Forbes]

This company is close also.

http://www.mondale-its.com/products/...n_Monitors.htm

9.2 million pixels in a 22 in monitor. 3800 x 2400

[Jeff Kilgroe]

I think that mondale one is using the same Hitachi 22" panel used by the IBM/ViewSonic T221/VX221. ...Just a hunch. ;)

From what I've seen of the IBM/ViewSonic model the panel is OK. Not very bright an poor color and contrast compared to current offerings like the Apple and Dell 30" models. They weren't very good for motion graphics or video, I don't recall what the pixel refresh/response time was, but it was probably around 22ms. Anything over about 14ms is terrible for video or motion work. There were other motion issues with the IBM/ViewSonic displays but I think it was due to the internal processing and handling of the 2 * dual-link DVI signals. I would imagine that a more current design could make a lot better use of that high res panel.