Sandy Bridge E processors out today...

[Wolf]

I'm just a DP and I don't know much about computers, but recently I HAD to learn a bit about SSDs...

Read and write speeds that are relevant for video and film are tested regularly. It's apparently called AS-SSD:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5147/t...review-512gb/3

AS-SSD have also made it into the marketing numbers, by some manufacturers:
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/SSD/OWC/Mercury_6G/

And, then there are the stories I hear at the rental houses about shoots with external recorders where somebody decided to put a Sandforce based SSD into it (even though it's not recommended!). Of course with disastrous results, otherwise it wouldn't be a story worth telling. ;-) But the more serious aspect being the cost of recovering the footage, with a starting price higher than a Scarlet. That last point being less relevant to this thread since SSDs used for these purposes won't hold camera originals.

My conclusion so far:
For an OS drive and general computing Sandforce based SSDs are awesome.
For a media drive Samsung & Intel leads the pack, and Sandforce based SSDs are possibly a really bad idea.

I would, of course, love to be proven wrong about the negative aspects of this post!

Hope that helps.

[Jon Thomasberg]

I also read somewhere that CS5 doesn't take advantage of more than 4cores (not even the additional threads of HT), which would make even hexacore a waste, but Jeff said it's actually efficient up to like 12-16 threads now. With that in mind, Hexacore (+HT) seems to be the route to take.

I can tell you from first-hand experience on my SB-E 3930k build that CS5.5.2 does utilize all 12 threads and distributes the load pretty equally. Perhaps you are right regarding the old CS5. No input to offer on that.

[Mike P.]

I can tell you from first-hand experience on my SB-E 3930k build that CS5.5.2 does utilize all 12 threads and distributes the load pretty equally. Perhaps you are right regarding the old CS5. No input to offer on that.

I figured as much; I mean I didn't think Kilgroe was lying or anything. What I want to know is how transcoding with Adobe software (media encoder through PPro or AE) compares to going through RCX? Knowing that CS5.5.x does take advantage of 12+ threads, does that mean you can convert from .r3d to, say, ProRes or DNxHD using the 12+ thread efficiency of Media Encoder or is limited by the RED SDK (which Adobe had to use in order to support the format in their apps)?

@Wolf: I think AS-SSD is just a benchmark that tests incompressible data. I'd be interested to hear the horror stories you've heard/read? I just assumed it was slower, not that it completely killed a workflow somehow.

EDIT: It was way faster in Adobe... But I think I may have had Alchemy group enabled in RCXp, so if that's the case it's not a very good test (even for a quick reference). Plus this is on a Macbook Air, so only 2cores/threads total... Kind of crappy compared to the potential of 4c/8thread.

[Wolf]

[QUOTE=
@Wolf: I think AS-SSD is just a benchmark that tests incompressible data. I'd be interested to hear the horror stories you've heard/read? I just assumed it was slower, not that it completely killed a workflow somehow.[/QUOTE]

That is my understanding too, that AS-SSD basically tests the incompressible data speeds. So a relevant number for image data. And that the compressed numbers are irrelevant.

I won't share any horror stories here, but it's basically total loss of all data. Sandforce has so far not been the leader in reliability.

[Justin Harrison]

Just made the purchase and found a 3930K with an ASUS X79 Pro in stock. I plan to OC it to 4.7 to keep it stable with the H100. Now I just need to figure out my storage/RAID setup for on set DIT work. Vertex 3 for the OS & apps with a software RAID-0 setup for scratch and work backed up to an external RAID should work...

Many many thanks to Jeff & Jon for helping making sense out of all these numbers and options!

Anyone with the ASUS boards have any experience with the SSD cacheing feature and performance numbers yet?

[Les Dittert]

I'm getting about 40 to 50% cpu utilization on P.Pro 5.5 .
Jon, Do you have high bit depth and maximum render quality in render settings ?
I'm going to and coming from an SSD, and the data rates are low, it should not be data rate bound.
I'm using a 1920 timeline, and making sure the 5K is fitting ( resizing ) into the 1920 window. Otherwise it was cropping, which may be easier to decode since it can throw away pixels.
Also, I'm saving as DPX, since they are easy to write, because it's not a codec, so it uses almost no cpu in comparison to a compressed codec.


When I use Red's RCX, I use the command line version to light up more cores. The redline command uses the rmd meta data to know how to export, as it was set in the RCX interactive GUI session.
redline is non GUI.
-Les

I can tell you from first-hand experience on my SB-E 3930k build that CS5.5.2 does utilize all 12 threads and distributes the load pretty equally. Perhaps you are right regarding the old CS5. No input to offer on that.

[Les Dittert]

So that's almost 2 frames per second to get the 5k to a 1920 sized dpx, with Prem. cs 5.5
( I'm using the r3d of a forrest scene that someone posted. It's 698 megabytes or so )
-Les

[Justin Harrison]

hey heres a random side note to some reviews of the H80 and H100 water coolers for the 3930 and 3960 chips for over clocking: http://hothardware.com/Reviews/Liqui.../Default.aspx#

[Petri Teittinen]

I get a sick feeling in my stomach whenever anyone talks about liquid cooling. I lost my previous encoding rig to a liquid cooler failure; the bloody thing sprung a leak and flooded the insides of the PC. Buh-bye pretty much everything in it.

[Brandon J.F.]

I get a sick feeling in my stomach whenever anyone talks about liquid cooling. I lost my previous encoding rig to a liquid cooler failure; the bloody thing sprung a leak and flooded the insides of the PC. Buh-bye pretty much everything in it.

Scary thought...