Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Top Ten Cinematography Travesties

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35
  1. #1 Top Ten Cinematography Travesties 
    Ok so we've had some opinions on the Top Ten Cinematography Masterpieces, what about the Top Ten Cinematography Travesties???
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulClements View Post
    Ok so we've had some opinions on the Top Ten Cinematography Masterpieces, what about the Top Ten Cinematography Travesties???
    Pick any ten Irish movies.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Moderator Tom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere worshiping Terrence Malick
    Posts
    8,206
    Half the pretentious handheld shit on the Sundance Channel for starters. ;)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Wedge In
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruairi Robinson View Post
    Pick any ten Irish movies.
    There are irish movies? I kid I kid.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    I seem to find it alot harder to think of the 10 worst than the ten best... I guess that's because there is far more scope for failure than there is for success! Plus if it's crap then it barely gets seen.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Wedge In
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by PaulClements View Post
    I seem to find it alot harder to think of the 10 worst than the ten best... I guess that's because there is far more scope for failure than there is for success! Plus if it's crap then it barely gets seen.
    I thinkso too. I think any piece of film making that gets made is an accomplishment in itself and deserves due credit regardless. Hence I dont think anything would really count as a travesty.

    My Kudos goes out to anyone who attempts to share his/her mind with an audience.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    I know that they are not the DPs, but some of Michael Bay's (Peephole shot of Martin Lawrence in Bad Boys) and Baz Luhrman's (Most of Moulin Rouge and some of Romeo and Juliet) movies use some of the most obnoxious shots I have seen on film, but I am looking forward to Transformers though.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Wedge In
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogelio Salinas View Post
    I know that they are not the DPs, but some of Michael Bay's (Peephole shot of Martin Lawrence in Bad Boys) and Baz Luhrman's (Most of Moulin Rouge and some of Romeo and Juliet) movies use some of the most obnoxious shots I have seen on film, but I am looking forward to Transformers though.
    Micheal Bay comes from the advertising world, hence the stylized commercial looking shots.

    I wonder what particular obnoxious shots you are referring to?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Quote Originally Posted by acehole View Post
    My Kudos goes out to anyone who attempts to share his/her mind with an audience.
    i agree totally

    i think the biggest travesty of cinematography is that it has been too expensive to make a movie with good image quality, everything needed to be funded, that has just changed with cheap HD cameras from canon HV20 at 1100 dollars to RED at around 20.000 for a functioning package, now anybody can make a film
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Wedge In
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by agwah View Post
    i agree totally

    i think the biggest travesty of cinematography is that it has been too expensive to make a movie with good image quality, everything needed to be funded, that has just changed with cheap HD cameras from canon HV20 at 1100 dollars to RED at around 20.000 for a functioning package, now anybody can make a film
    See, I think that the "crap" cinematography of the HD's and DV's have an inherit aesthetic within themselves which is great as long as it doesn't try to be something it isn't. But the problem I see with these type of films is not so much the delivery but talent in front of the lens.. A crappy actor with pimples and bad makeup, unstyled hair, will affect the 'perceived' cinematography more than anything I can imagine.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts