Thread: 2 More Cases For Sale

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1 2 More Cases For Sale 
    Senior Member Harry Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,625
    Hi everyone...
    I've thrown another 2 hard cases up on eBay:
    This one was for my 300mm Zeiss:
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...:L:LCA:US:1123
    This was for my Cooke 20-100:
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...:L:LCA:US:1123
    Again, nothing wrong with them, I just got A&J cases that match the rest of my gear. Strictly an image/ vanity thing.
    Cheers,
    Harry
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Harry Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,625
    No takers?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by harryclark View Post
    No takers?
    I am not surprised.

    I have been doing some math lately.
    In this whole world about 5000 movies are made every year.
    Assuming a 2 month average shooting per movie, that will make 10K months a year. That is 850 shooting years. If everybody shoot with RED, (which is not going to happen for another 50 years), then we will need about 1000 REDs to do the job. In 2008, there will be over 5000 REDS in use. Or, in otherwords, there is an over abundance of REDs out there.

    All enthusiasm we see on these forums are the result of anticipation of getting their first REDs. By next year this time, all the enthusiasm we see on these forums might turn to gloom and frustration. Boom and Bust. Add to the mix, another 10000 4K 24P Panasonics and Sonys. It will be avalanche following a lomg drought. Everybody will be drowned in 4k 24P and not enough projects to use it on.

    I do not want to be the doom and gloom guy. I was just thinking aloud. I am sure I have not considered all the other parameters. Things may not be as bad. But, it is a thought anyway. I would like to hear other opinions.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Harry Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,625
    whaaaa.....?
    I'm selling some used cases on eBay.
    I admit there's a glut of wannabees encroaching on the professional workspace, but we'll all still eat... I think...
    H.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Alexis Hanawalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    712
    Quote Originally Posted by harryclark View Post
    whaaaa...
    ...aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah????
    Alexis Hanawalt
    Bolster Camera, Inc.

    www.bolstercamera.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckt View Post
    I am not surprised.

    I have been doing some math lately.
    In this whole world about 5000 movies are made every year.
    Assuming a 2 month average shooting per movie, that will make 10K months a year. That is 850 shooting years. If everybody shoot with RED, (which is not going to happen for another 50 years), then we will need about 1000 REDs to do the job. In 2008, there will be over 5000 REDS in use. Or, in otherwords, there is an over abundance of REDs out there.
    Interesting logic... although I assume you are ignoring the second and third largest users of 35mm cameras (and I'm guessing REDs): the commercial advertisers, and blue-chip documentaries.

    I am constantly amazed at how single minded people on this forum are. Yes there are going to be alot of RED's, but there are going to be a lot of markets for them. Not just feature film, but commercials, documentaries, music videos, anything where 35mm film was used previously. I'm not saying REDs will replace 35mm but I can see a lot of applications where it would be preferable.

    I doubt Starbucks thought "Gee.. only 2m people drink coffee daily, we'd better not open another Starbucks round the corner". Supply can drive demand, both ways.

    my two cents
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Quote Originally Posted by chuckt View Post
    I do not want to be the doom and gloom guy. I was just thinking aloud. I am sure I have not considered all the other parameters. Things may not be as bad. But, it is a thought anyway. I would like to hear other opinions.
    I would say it's correct you haven't considered all the parameters- if you think that movies are the only way to consume motion picture media you are making the same mistake that the music industry did with MP3s. Also there is no chance that cable companies or satellite are going to reduce the number of channels- much less HD channels. The only real challenge is how do we fit all the stuff into the bandwidth we have. For every writer's strike, or what have you there are 1,000 "wannabees" ready to take their place


    And unfortunately us wannabees have ruined a perfectly good thread trying to sell some cases- sorry about that Harry
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Harry Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,625
    Ha!
    That's OK, I guess there's no interest in the cases anyway...
    And ALL discussions on this forum are interesting to me!
    Cheers,
    Harry
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Me too- If I had lenses as nice as those I'd buy your cases ;)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    There are several thousand features shot every year outside of the hollywood studio system but only a handful are good enough for distribution. 98 percent of camera requirements have nothing to do with narrative feature movies.

    By the way only 10 computers were originally predicted to evey be required in the world. Guess the "experts?" were just a tad wrong on that one too.
    ----------------------
    Cheers!
    http://www.techyoumedia.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts