Thread: EPIC audio meters are very unusual

Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11  
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    31
    IMO it really depends on how, where and what country you started off in the industry.

    I've trained audio engineers and found PPMs take a bit of getting used to, some folk get off to a bad start (read stuffing up a job) and never get to like them.

    The primary problem with digital camera audio meters is, an audio recording engineer is not keeping watch on the meters all the time, so after the levels are set, they tend to be forgotten.

    The ideal would be VU switchable to PPM with a good a set of in/out audio limiters.
    Never gonna happen, even tho sound is 70% of what you see.

    Cheers.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Senior Member James Brundige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Snowmass, Colorado
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by Jochen Schmidt-Hambrock View Post
    Is ist just me who finds the Epic's audio meter characteristics very unusual?
    The noise floor meters quite hight and the peaks are very sudden and ... ahm.... peaky.

    Not like any audio meter I have (and I have lots of them).

    I'm not talking about sound quality, just the visual of the meters.

    Jochen
    They are unusual for a camera of this quality in that they suck. I've been railing about this for three years, still hoping the Pro I/O will provide decent metering, but looks like not. Audio is an afterthought at Red; they are aiming at a market that uses double system.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,316
    Quote Originally Posted by James Brundige View Post
    They are unusual for a camera of this quality in that they suck. I've been railing about this for three years, still hoping the Pro I/O will provide decent metering, but looks like not. Audio is an afterthought at Red; they are aiming at a market that uses double system.
    Sadly you're right there. Cinema style is definitely their priority.
    Director/Digital Camera Operator/2nd AC/DIT/Data Manager
    London, UK.

    Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Senior Member James Brundige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Snowmass, Colorado
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by Allan Black View Post
    IMO it really depends on how, where and what country you started off in the industry.

    I've trained audio engineers and found PPMs take a bit of getting used to, some folk get off to a bad start (read stuffing up a job) and never get to like them.

    The primary problem with digital camera audio meters is, an audio recording engineer is not keeping watch on the meters all the time, so after the levels are set, they tend to be forgotten.

    The ideal would be VU switchable to PPM with a good a set of in/out audio limiters.
    Never gonna happen, even tho sound is 70% of what you see.

    Cheers.
    I beg to differ. They are just bad, too few segments, really jumpy, hard to read. Solution will be to stack a mix-pre onto the Pro I/O. Better solution would be to have a module with decent meters (and pots) built in. There are so many one and two man crews out there in the non-Hollywood world. I've shot years that way, and it's so important to be able to glance at the camera to check that' audio is OK. When you are in a docu situation, and reacting to things that are moving fast, that's key.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member James Brundige's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Snowmass, Colorado
    Posts
    816
    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Wielage View Post
    I agree, the Red metering characteristics seem non-standard and unintuitive. There's not a lot of data on them in the manual. I also believe there's not a lot of headroom in the analog input section, and it's prone to overload very easily. For this reason, I've always advised my clients to only rely on Red audio as backup, not for primary sound.

    I say the same thing about all digital cameras, so this is not just a criticism of Red.
    My Sony EX-1 audio section is far easier to use. I often use it as a sound recorder for Red, and get an alternate angle as well. This will be solved eventually, maybe by module, maybe by third party. Until then, double system is best.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    L.A. penal colony
    Posts
    88
    RED should offer both average and peak metering in one bar like Dorrough does (best audio meters in the business)

    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    381
    I REALLY wish, RED would partner with Sound Devices and produce a solid high quality audio IO unit for their cameras. Many people don't have the budget to spend on a dedicated sound recordist, especially if you're shooting basic interview setups. Also the syncing sound in post takes more time and ultimately adds costs.

    We're basically looking for a Mix Pre that is customised for Epic/Scarlet - time RED really sorted the audio side of their cameras as we're now way down the line and don't need excuses. Full broadcast spec sound onboard cameras today is a given and I urge RED to address the criticisms that are thrown their way in terms of audio quality/performance.

    Scott
    Midas Media
    www.midasmedia.tv
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts