Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L USM or IS II USM version?

[Milton Loo]

Trying to decide which one to pick up.

The non IS version retails for $1500 while the IS II USM version retails for $2500.

Is there such a jump in quality as to justify the extra grand? For that matter is 'IS' that critical for motion picture shooting? For the record, the lens will be primarily used on a Scarlet and occasionally Epic M. Any advice and input appreciated!

[Dave Blackham]

IS is both good and bad. Good if the shot is static as its very stable but the image will wander from the IS if you try to pan. I believe opticaly they are near identical.

[Paul Russell]

iS is essential if you plan to do any handheld work. You can switch it off if you don't like it

[Milton Loo]

Thanks for the prompt reply Dave!

I'm a fan of dynamic shots (dolly, slider, steadicam, etc). Doubt I'll be shooting much pure static shots. I suppose I'll have to trust my head/sticks for image stability lol. Probably leaning to the non IS version at the moment. The extra grand could be put into better use (ie. a nice L series prime).

[Mark Pedersen]

If you ever plan to use as a still lens, get the IS. It is amazingly good for shooting handheld and getting Sharp images.

M

[Greg McDonald]

The 70-200mm IS II is on sale at B&H Photo and Samy's for $2,069 with free U.S. shipping until Feb. 4th.