Thread: Opinions wanted - DIT Workstation Components

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1 Opinions wanted - DIT Workstation Components 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9
    Hi everyone,

    A new newbie here. I'm about to put together a windows workstation for DIT work. I selected components
    for max bandwidth throughput and overall system speed for 4K/5K. Please check my Newegg.com wishlist and
    voice your opinions and recommendations. Thank you!

    http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/Pu...umber=23353527

    PS: I'm also considering tossing all components minus the internal RAID, inside this lunchbox pc enclosure.
    I travel a lot, and that thingy fits nice in the overhead compartment :-)

    http://sterlingportable.com/store/Ap...table computer

    PPS: A Red Rocket card is to be included of course.

    Thank you again!

    Jim
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Jon Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TULSA
    Posts
    888
    I just switched to MAC, so you know where I would take this convo, lol. I noticed you put the RED ROCKET card at the bottom of the list, as a PS, but I would def. put it at the top of the list. It is probably the single most important piece of equipment, when your dealing with r3d's. I would build your system around that if you want to render r3d's with any kind of speed. Otherwise your looking at tons of wasted time, and heartache trying to work with 4k files in a Windows system. There are people on the Internets...and... this forum that will tell you that you can use whatever crappy machine you want to render out "quality" material. Just don't pay attention, lol. Better just start digging deep because it's an expensive industry. Anyway that's my humble opinion.
    RED camera owner.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    If you're traveling a bit, be careful of those heavy video cards. They can be jarred from the mother board, and cause all sorts of havok.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    15
    I actually don't see the RedRocket on this list, but like Jon said above, it's the most important piece. I actually think the $4k graphics card on this list is overkill... the RedRocket is doing all the work anyway, so there isn't really a point in paying a premium for a bleeding-edge graphics card.

    Don't forget an ABS to protect your investment.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Posts
    1,234
    Yes, go for the GTX 580 3GB. It is faster than Quadro 6000 unless you are dabbling in vector graphics or dual precision operations. Not sure what software you are planning to use or what your system/workflow is - that will dictate what hardware you should choose. Overall, looks like a good setup.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Andrew clemson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Dubai, U.A.E
    Posts
    1,147
    I wouldnt kill yourself getting that rocket to start out unless youre 100% sure youll only be working RED gigs. Remember its not much use with other cameras ;)
    RED Tech and D.I.T,
    EPIC M, EPIC-X and Scarlet Pusher,
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    9
    Thank you everyone for your feedback. Now I notice the arrangement in my posting left the Red Rocket card as a low priority of sort but is not. The Quadro 6000 is to be used with Resolve and Adobe SpeedGrade CS6, hopefully...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Stivan Widick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Most-Chosen City on Earth
    Posts
    326
    My understanding is that Resolve does not use the graphics card used for the interface to perform its color work. You will need a GPU for the interface, and another for Resolve's heavy lifting. Adobe uses the interface card for both. You'll be much better off with 2 GTX 580s and the RED Rocket than with a quadro. If you need the 10-bit output that a Quadro provides, I suggest the Quadro 4000, a GTX 580, and the RR.
    Epic-X #01895 (23) "Jughead"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member MichaelP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,322
    If going PC, then why not consider one all built and ready to go?
    http://www.1beyond.com/products/mobi...search=mobiles

    Michael
    ‎"There are a thousand ways to point a camera, but really only one."
    Ernst Lubitsch
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Kolkata, India
    Posts
    1,234
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Woo View Post
    Thank you everyone for your feedback. Now I notice the arrangement in my posting left the Red Rocket card as a low priority of sort but is not. The Quadro 6000 is to be used with Resolve and Adobe SpeedGrade CS6, hopefully...
    I don't know what might work with the hypothetical Speedgrade CS6, but for Resolve you are much better off with a Quadro 600 for GUI and a GTX 580 3 GB or two for processing. GTX 580 3 GB is faster than Quadro 6000 (source: Blackmagic Design's official config guide) and also a fraction the price. Or if you wait 4 weeks, you can go for a GTX 670 Ti, which should be faster, cheaper and use significantly less power than GTX 580. Another great advantage is 670 Ti will be PCIe 3.0, which offers double bandwidth. So you can get PCIe 2.0 16x equivalent bandwidth off a 8x slot. This is greatly advantageous on the long run - you will not run into any bottlenecks even after using 3 different GPUs, 1 Rocket and a RAID card. Such a config will be impossible with PCIe 2.0 cards.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts