Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: EPIC Pulling 7G's @ Mach 0.95 via a F-16 Fighter Jet.

Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64
  1. #31  
    Badass moments...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #32  
    Senior Member KETCH ROSSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ITALY
    Posts
    9,948
    Pooling 7G's and have the take to turn around and take a snap shot... Nice... ;)
    KETCH ROSSi | EPIC-M DRAGON M8
    Producer | Director | DoP |
    *CinePhotographer
    __________________________________________________
    *Registered Trademark of RED DIGITAL CINEMA


    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #33  
    Senior Member Adam Beck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    344
    Being tall, I may not make the 7G turn. I would be lights out and the camera moving free throughout the cockpit.
    Scarlet X #00056 "Rhett Butler"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #34  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Chester, UK
    Posts
    625
    I get the feeling Warp Stabilizer will be working over time after that....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #35  
    Senior Member Eric Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    286
    I wonder if the IS of that Canon lens worked in those conditions...
    "Don't under-estimate the amateur photographer. The latest HW & SW empower him to achieve results just as good as yours"
    My modest setup: Win7 x64, AMD X2 4200+, NVIDIA GTS 450 1GB, 6GB RAM, Dell U2410 24" LCD
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #36  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    889
    Quote Originally Posted by Brook Willard View Post

    [There's a RED One in my lap]
    Or were you just happy to see them? -sc
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #37  
    Senior Member Peter Majtan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Japan, USA
    Posts
    2,578
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Z View Post
    I wonder if the IS of that Canon lens worked in those conditions...
    That's the new 24-70 mkII - no IS on this baby...
    You don't need eyes to see, You need a vision!
    www.petermajtan.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #38  
    Senior Member Zakaree Sandberg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    orange county/los angeles
    Posts
    3,862
    gonna guess the new top gun.. maybe tests?
    Zakaree Sandberg
    Zakaree@Gmail.com
    Cinematographer / Local 600 DIT
    RED MX - 1015
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #39  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Majtan View Post
    That's the new 24-70 mkII - no IS on this baby...
    Definitely says "Stabilizer" right on the side of the lens... It's the 24-105 L IS
    RED SCARLET #00377 "LEO" LEONARDO
    Checkout our work: Artefact | SWYP | WVIL
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #40  
    Senior Member Brian Iannone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles & France
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker Spofford View Post
    Definitely says "Stabilizer" right on the side of the lens... It's the 24-105 L IS
    It is indeed a 24-105mm f/4L. It looks like IS was on during that shoot.
    A 19-year-old student with a love for cinematography and a passion for geophysics.

    Personal: www.brianiannone.com, Portfolio: visuals.brianiannone.com, Business: www.ik3.co, Twitter: @brianiannone

    The List of Scarlet Names | The List of EPIC Names
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts