Thread: "new Ipad" (3) , how do I get highest quality demo video on it ?

Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 14 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 138
  1. #91  
    Senior Member Les Dittert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    879
    Can someone summarize the recommended way to encode , using Prem cs5.5 or AE ?
    I'm getting some unusual results with these , for example h264 is capped at 2000 pixels across.
    When I try mp4, it is banding like crazy, even tho it's at 9MBit rate. Something is wacky !
    My previous tests were from Fusion, but that is not my usual workflow component.
    thanks
    -Les Dittert
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #92  
    Senior Member Brian Iannone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles & France
    Posts
    1,495
    I personally would stay with H.264 at 1080p and a high data rate, but, perhaps the MPEG-4 encoding at 2K with a low data rate is producing results better than that of H.264 at 1080p with a high data rate.

    Justin, were you able to tell if your MPEG-4 files at 2K+ looked better on the iPad's display than just a 1080p H.264 file?
    A 19-year-old student with a love for cinematography and a passion for geophysics.

    Personal: www.brianiannone.com, Portfolio: visuals.brianiannone.com, Business: www.ik3.co, Twitter: @brianiannone

    The List of Scarlet Names | The List of EPIC Names
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #93  
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    76
    I ran a number of tests with 1080p h.264 vs 2k mpeg4 using the Timescapes 1440p trailer as a source. If you compare screen shots, edges looked slightly sharper (if there was no motion, or practically none) with 2k mpeg4 BUT in motion, h.264 looked much much better. h.264 retains a lot more detail in my opinion.

    I was using handbrake at around 50Megabit for both. x264 vs ffmpeg mpeg4.

    Bill

    Edit: I'm not convinced they look as different in motion after further testing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #94  
    Senior Member Brian Iannone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles & France
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by BillBarnes View Post
    I ran a number of tests with 1080p h.264 vs 2k mpeg4 using the Timescapes 1440p trailer as a source. If you compare screen shots, edges looked slightly sharper (if there was no motion, or practically none) with 2k mpeg4 BUT in motion, h.264 looked much much better. h.264 retains a lot more detail in my opinion.

    I was using handbrake at around 50Megabit for both. x264 vs ffmpeg mpeg4.

    Bill
    Sorry, but I just have to ask. :D What settings were you using in HandBrake? (I know, there's a lot...) Or, did you use a built-in preset?
    A 19-year-old student with a love for cinematography and a passion for geophysics.

    Personal: www.brianiannone.com, Portfolio: visuals.brianiannone.com, Business: www.ik3.co, Twitter: @brianiannone

    The List of Scarlet Names | The List of EPIC Names
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #95  
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    76
    Lol, no worries dude, lemme make a list. I'll update this post asap.

    Handbrake Settings:

    H.264 Settings

    OUTPUT SETTINGS:
    container: mp4
    large file size: no
    web optimized: no
    ipod 5g support: no

    PICTURE:

    width: 1920
    height: 1080
    keep aspect ratio: yes

    anamorphic: none
    modulus: 16

    cropping: none

    VIDEO FILTERS:
    none

    VIDEO:
    video codec: h.264 (x264)
    FPS: Same as source
    quality: Avg Bitrate - 50,000 kbps
    2 pass encoding: yes
    turbo first pass: yes

    AUDIO:
    1 Track - AAC Passthrough

    SUBTITLES/CHAPTERS:
    none

    ADVANCED:
    I used the Regular Preset - High Profile's defaults
    No DCT-Decimate: yes



    MPEG 4 SETTINGS

    All the same from above EXCEPT:

    PICTURE:
    Width: 2048
    Height: 1152

    VIDEO:
    Video Codec: MPEG-4 (FFMPEG)

    So i went back and looked at each file in CineXplayer and instead of taking screenshots I paused them and looked at it with the magnifying glass. I'll post some screen shots in a couple minutes for comparison.

    edit: Might take a little longer for comparison stills, I'll reserve judgement until they're done.



    It's pretty difficult to stop CineXPlayer on the same frame of 2 different videos, but these are pretty close. I took the screen shot, added the text and uploaded them. No changes to the images other than that. I'm honestly pretty surprised that the MPEG4 file did this well. If anyone has some 4k source material they'd like to see tested I be glad to take a look.

    H264 Screenshot - Click Thumbnail for full image:


    MPEG4 Screenshot - Click Thumbnail for full image:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #96  
    Senior Member Andrew M.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Virginia EPIC #2441
    Posts
    1,884
    What I am seeing is that 2048 format is native to the iPad3 display so keeping it in this aspect ratio for iPad3 must produce less of Moire effect.
    Especially visible when playing turbine-lines.mov file that is encoded at 2048 pixels (see posts from above).

    I meant, aspecially not visible when playing 2048 file. (Morie not visible at all at 2048)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #97  
    Moderator Tom Lowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    somewhere worshiping Terrence Malick
    Posts
    8,207
    Hey guys, can you give me a summary of the findings thus far? I'm sure this will be of great interest to many iPad/resolution nerd/filmmaker types out thee.

    Is it basically that H264 will only go up to 1920, but MPEG4 will work at 2048? To my eyes, the MPEG4 screenshot above looks better, but obviously I have not seen this in motion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #98  
    Senior Member Justin O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Diego/LA/Seattle
    Posts
    1,417
    I haven't been able to render 2048 h.264s with REDcine-X at all… It just crashes. I am able to render out 2048 MP4s at 32 Mbit per second no problem.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #99  
    Senior Member Brian Iannone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles & France
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by Justin O'Neill View Post
    I haven't been able to render 2048 h.264s with REDcine-X at all… It just crashes. I am able to render out 2048 MP4s at 32 Mbit per second no problem.
    If you want a 2048 H.264 file, you could try exporting Uncompressed from RCX, import that into Squeeze and then encode a level 4 or 4.1 H.264 file from there.
    A 19-year-old student with a love for cinematography and a passion for geophysics.

    Personal: www.brianiannone.com, Portfolio: visuals.brianiannone.com, Business: www.ik3.co, Twitter: @brianiannone

    The List of Scarlet Names | The List of EPIC Names
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #100  
    Senior Member Justin O'Neill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Diego/LA/Seattle
    Posts
    1,417
    Wow, this is surprising. Bumping the rez even a tiny bit to 2112x1111 isn't playable on the iPad: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5673574/retina-2112.mov
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts