Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: 48fps The Hobbit - First Review

Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 41011121314
Results 131 to 135 of 135
  1. #131  
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Toia View Post
    I did.. the very first line :) ... Ill make it bigger for you.
    Sorry mate. I could have sworn that first bit was not there when I read your post :)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #132  
    Senior Member Will Keir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,951
    Missed the Miami Vice film all together but an example of a potentially good film turned bad was "Apocalypto." 360 degree shutter ruins it for me. Are there any 360 degree shutter films visually appealing? Gotta love Dr. Who but that's a 25fps vs 24fps issue I believe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Toia View Post
    Im far from worried Ketch, Peter jackson isnt a mug... he has some very good people working with him. (quite a few friends of mine as well)
    Even they are not so thrilled about the look of it at 48fps. im sure they are going to do something to make it feel right.

    Remember when Michael MANN did Miami Vice on the SonyHDCAM with the 360 degree shutter... Had to be the worst film I watched that year. I liked the content (huge Michael Mann fan) , but the smooth video look killed it for me.
    Last edited by Will Keir; 05-07-2012 at 07:31 AM.
    Will Keir
    Creative Director ~ Jumping Rock Pictures
    Epic X #2482 / R1 #3033

    "Why I choose film?
    The friendships, the adventure, the art."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #133  
    REDuser Sponsor Chris Parker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,932
    48fps is lame. i don't like it. for all i know, this is just me showing my age, and the kids will flock to it and it will become the new norm. but i don't like it. digital has come a long way in achieving that 'film look' but without the grain, etc. i think this is a step backwards. all i can think of is seeing the ARRI projection of film shot and projected at 48fps two years ago at Cinegear, and how much i hated the look of it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #134  
    Senior Member Mark Toia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane... But could be anywhere in the world today
    Posts
    3,099
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Parker View Post
    48fps is lame. i don't like it. for all i know, this is just me showing my age, and the kids will flock to it and it will become the new norm. but i don't like it. digital has come a long way in achieving that 'film look' but without the grain, etc. i think this is a step backwards. all i can think of is seeing the ARRI projection of film shot and projected at 48fps two years ago at Cinegear, and how much i hated the look of it.
    dito....
    Mark Toia
    Director / DP / Founder of Zoom Film & Television

    RED EPIC M #456, RED EPIC X #612, RED EPIC X #1137, RED EPIC DRAGON #(coming Soon)

    www.toia.com

    www.zoomfilmtv.com.au
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #135  
    Senior Member Ryan Farnes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    140
    Important to note that the big names (Jackson, Cameron) are shooting these rates because of 3D.

    I wonder what Jackson would shoot at if he makes another 2D film.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts