Thread: AMD Opteron 32-Core - is the Adobe Suite using 32 Cores?

Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31  
    2nd call from Adobe: it's important to have more CPU power than CPU's in the system. The support max. recommended a 8-core system, with the highest Ghz available.
    4GB Ram per Core -> 24GB.

    Hmm...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #32  
    Quote Originally Posted by Fabian Benninghoven View Post
    2nd call from Adobe: it's important to have more CPU power than CPU's in the system. The support max. recommended a 8-core system, with the highest Ghz available.
    4GB Ram per Core -> 24GB.

    Hmm...
    Very interesting thread !

    I will follow the Clevo route with P170EM


    Nvidia Geforce GTX675M *2Go
    Intel® i7-3920QM 4x2 cores - 2.9GHz à 3.6GHz - 8 Mo cache - 55 Watts (Ivy Bridge)
    DDR3 Sodimm 32Go 1333Mhz quadri-channel
    ssd for system
    2x750 esata raid 0 for media


    Plus 3 x usb 3,1x esata


    I would have wait for thunderbolt, but i am not sure the Rocket will be indispensable

    Any suggestions from our Gurus ?
    #MX2070
    Paris
    The frenchie doc
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #33  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stamford CT
    Posts
    1,021
    wow i seen a 64 core model on titanus! it can have 512gbs of ram too! talk about crazy specs
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #34  
    Senior Member Joel Arvidsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,029
    Did anyone try the amd with premiere yet?
    Scarlet #00549 Elmer
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #35  
    The Xeon E5's smoke these AMD systems in per core and per clock comparisons. The advantage of the AMD is price, in particular they can offer more cores for less money, but the cores aren't as good. And very few applications can scale well beyond 2, maybe 4 CPUs. Premiere does a pretty good job getting to 8 with MPE, but after 8 processors, the diminishing returns really become obvious. Anything more than about 12 threads seems to almost start slowing things down.

    The monster AMD systems are good for render farms, massive database servers...

    All the good dual Xeon E5 and larger motherboards / workstations will accept 512GB RAM too....
    - Jeff Kilgroe
    - Applied Visual Technologies, LLC | RojoMojo
    - EPIC-M Package Available! Over 1TB SSD media, RPP's & more.


    List of all current RED software tools.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #36  
    Senior Member Joel Arvidsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,029
    Jeff, you made me take another look at the xeon again. Was suppose to just order a 3930 system but from what I have read here it seams that alot of 3930 systems seams to struggle abit on the 4k but works ok in quad hd. I like to be able to run 4k at half res solid and at the same time output with a black magic card to hd/2k monitor.SLI

    What do you think about this system below? It may not scream like some monster builds on reduser but for 4k I think this could be pretty solid. I have not found any with this processor here so I don't know what perfomance I should expect.
    The system will be used for premiere and resolve. Fore storage I plan to run a windows 8 server connected with 4gigbit lan cables but thats another story.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ASUS Z9PE-D8 WS, 2xSocket-2011
    SSI-EEB, C602, 8xDDR3, 7xG3-PCIe-x16, SLI/CFX, 2xIntel GbLAN, 2xFW, iKVM

    (two of those below)
    Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-1650
    Socket-LGA2011, 6-Core, 3.2Ghz, 12MB, 130W, TRAY/without FAN

    (two of those below)
    Kingston DDR3 1333MHz 16GB ECC KIT
    2x8GB 1333MHz DDR3 ECC CL9 DIMM

    Fractal Design Define XL Black Pearl
    Fan:1x 140mm Front, 1x 180mm Top, 1x 140mm Bakside, noise reduced, m/e-ATX, USB3

    Intel® SSD 520 Series 240GB 2.5"
    SATA 6 Gb/s (SATA3.0), 550MB/520MB/s read/write, bulk (OEM)

    ZOTAC GeForce GTX 680 4GB PhysX CUDA
    PCI-Express 3.0, GDDR5, DVI-D+DVI-I, native-HDMI, DisplayPort,

    Noctua NH-U12DX CPU Cooler
    Socket 771, Intel Xeon 5xxx, 7xxx,1300 RPM, 92,3 m³/h, 19,8 dBA, 120mm FAN

    Cooler Master Silent Pro M2 1500W PSU
    ATX 12V V2.3, 80 Plus Silver, Modular, 6x 6+2pin PCIe, 6x 8pin PCIe, 12x SATA
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also do you need sli to run on premiere and resolve? If you dont need sli I found a better workstation moderboard.
    ASUS Z9PE-D16, 2xSocket-2011
    E-ATX,C602-A,16xDDR3,4xPCIe(3.0)x16,3xIntel i350 GbLAN,1x Mgmt LAN, VGA, iKVM

    Another confusion is that on resolves recomandation there is a
    Intel Xeon E5-2620 6C/12T
    2.00 GHz, TLC: 15 MB, Turbo: Yes, 7.2 GT/s, TX/RX300 S7, RX350 S7
    It cost almost the same as the
    Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-1650
    Socket-LGA2011, 6-Core, 3.2Ghz, 12MB, 130W, TRAY/without FAN
    Wich one is the better for premiere and resolve?


    Hope there some helpful people on this thread. I really like to order this within a week or two.

    Cheers!
    Scarlet #00549 Elmer
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts