Instead, IMHO, I think RED is more concerned about actually having a legacy to leave...by steering Hollywood's clumsy transition from ANALOG to DIGITAL...by paving the way, blazing if they have to, into dark corners and new directions that other companies never could because they were driven only by profit.
Indeed...RED's ability to look beyond the bottom line has routinely kept them several steps ahead of their competition...
And this majestic need to change Hollywood is...I don't think...compatible with competing to make an affordable RAW camcorder.
They have bigger fish to fry.
By the way, if it weren't for the fact RED has twisted the market into a new quality and price standard, BM would be playing the overpricing games of yesteryears along with every other camera companies, charging you anywhere from $6k to $20K for a 2k camera.
why don't you just buy the blackmagic camera?
Why would Red build a camera that is not the future when in fact they pioneer the future?
Red is a premium branded professional digital cinema camera manufacture,I don't think they are going to consumer level.In industry who ever use Red cameras people think they are the high end professionals.so each and every business there have marketing strategy and position.Just look at the Toyota ,there cars are ordinary car.but the same company make luxury premium models with different name and logo that call Lexus.so I have a request for to Red.If Red planing to go for consumer level and price range please go with different name and logo.then company can make more money and market.then please maintain Red as it is..................
Last edited by SUNILPREM; 05-05-2012 at 01:26 AM.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|