Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Gamma 2.2

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #1 Gamma 2.2 
    Hey all, Just a reminder (in the mac world) to set your monitors to 2.2 gamma.

    I just got a new system over the weekend and for a brief moment was wondering why everything looked like crap.. then remembered and changed it.

    Just a reminder, since new macs ( at least the new mac pro towers) still come with 1.8 gamma as default, hopefully some day that will change.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Justin Kirchhoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,520
    Just curious Jarred, what new system did you get? Specs?
    www.digitalshakedown.com
    producer@digitalshakedown.com
    http://www.vimeo.com/channels/digitalshakedown

    EPIC-X #204 "JIGSAW" + SCARLET-X #1097
    DIGITAL SHAKEDOWN - A FULL SERVICE PRODUCTION COMPANY - Concept to Delivery
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member A. Bastaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Abu Dhabi, UAE
    Posts
    817
    how do you configure that on windows? ive got the 256mb standard video card. im running winx64 on mac pro. nvidia standard card. are there any gamma 2.2 icc profiles i could load?

    googling at the moment.. ill upload as soon as i could find one.

    so far it seems like windows already are gamma 2.2 calibrated
    ________
    Alaska Dispensary
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    The catch is that Final Cut Pro assumes your monitor is set to 1.8 and displays video supposedly corrected for that. See here.
    You should follow me on Twitter here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Most PC displays are somewhat close to 2.2 gamma to start with, it's just the Mac world that has traditionally been (and apparently still is) 1.8.

    Here's a test chart you can use to tell what gamma your monitor is:
    http://www.normankoren.com/makingfin...tml#gammachart

    Note that quite often, a different application may do its own gamma correction! An image displayed in Photoshop often looks different than the same image displayed in my Firefox web browser. Download the test image from the link above, try it and see.

    Note also, sometimes people say the gamma is off when actually it's the black level that is set wrong- both of those affect how contrasty or washed-out the image looks. The chart above lets you check both.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #6  
    Quote Originally Posted by Justin_Kirch View Post
    Just curious Jarred, what new system did you get? Specs?
    I bought one of the new 2008 Mac Pro towers for home. 3.0ghz x8-cores with 8gb memory. I put a 160gb 10,000rpm Raptor as boot drive and it sure makes a difference over the stock drive apple gives you.

    I also ordered 3 500gb drives from newegg to put in the internal drive caddy in a raid0 config to handle day to day render large video files.

    Im experimenting using Idisk to sync my desktop and AAsync to make my little lacie sync via the internet on my work system so i dont need to haul around little drives anymore.. so far it works pretty good...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #7  
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Kenny View Post
    The catch is that Final Cut Pro assumes your monitor is set to 1.8 and displays video supposedly corrected for that. See here.
    yeah.. wouldn't it be great if that actually worked :)

    Quicktime has a gamma box that is supposed to overide the 1.8 gamma overide, but that as well, doesnt always work, and only works for people that have studio 2 installed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Tech forum value 
    Senior Member Blair S. Paulsen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    2,237
    Thanks Chris & jbeale for the references. The Apple article looks like something I will be printing out and keeping right by my Mac.

    I have often been critical of using computer monitors for judging video, perhaps with better set up I can close that gap for those times when a proper video monitor is not available. I still think the toe will be represented very differently but its a step in the right direction. Sorry about the pun.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9.   Click here to go to the next RED TEAM post in this thread.
  #9  
    Blair before you get too excited and make that document your bible, remember that that article was written almost 4 years ago.

    still some good info in it, but alot has changed since then.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Anders Holck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,316
    Wouldn't the only correct handeling of this be that all software would either render through colorsync or check the gamma setting of the current screen profile.

    Just assuming something always seems to be a bad thing :-)
    Facebook Skype: aholck
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts