Thread: SpeedGrade

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 103
  1. #1 SpeedGrade 
    Senior Member Paul Lee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    894
    Anyone using it? Thoughts, comments, etc.?
    Paul Lee | 42 Productions | Boulder, Colorado | www.42productions.com
    2x EPIC with PL, Canon and Leica Mounts, 1x RED ONE
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Junior Member Grant H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    21
    Used it very briefly last night with some test footage (1080p 5DII material) and it crashed spectacularly half way through a grade. Wasted around 20 minutes but was a painful enough experience to have me question using it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    267
    Ditto, unstable and clunky
    Epic-X #3794

    w: CreativeWaveIdaho.com
    t: @CreativeWaveID
    f: Facebook.com/CreativeWave
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Eren Ozkural's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    London/Istanbul
    Posts
    751
    I think Adobe purchasing Iridas and implementing Speedgrade into it's workflow is commendable but there's one feature in particular that's stopping me from going into that route:

    The "send to Speedgrade" option in Premiere should just open the original time line with original media, whatever the codec(s) like the "replace with After Effects Composition" feature. The reason why i'm over the moon with Adobe is because they've eliminated all transcoding to get into the edit. It's a shame to resort to a bottleneck during finishing.
    KINOTRIGGER
    Feature Films, Fashion Films, Photography, S3D, Pre/Post/Production.

    VIMEO YOUTUBE TWITTER
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Brandon J.F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,709
    Quote Originally Posted by Eren Ozkural View Post
    I think Adobe purchasing Iridas and implementing Speedgrade into it's workflow is commendable but there's one feature in particular that's stopping me from going into that route:

    The "send to Speedgrade" option in Premiere should just open the original time line with original media, whatever the codec(s) like the "replace with After Effects Composition" feature. The reason why i'm over the moon with Adobe is because they've eliminated all transcoding to get into the edit. It's a shame to resort to a bottleneck during finishing.
    I'm sure something like that will be added in the not-too-distant future.
    Hybrid Vigor
    Learn: Kickstarter Marketing Video TutorialWatch: Film TeaserRead: Official SiteFollow: TwitterLike: Facebook (new page)

    Our Kickstarter campaign was a Staff Pick! We were also Featured on Kickstarter's home page and we won Indiewire's Project of the Week with over 70% of the total votes. Our campaign was very successful. The fundraising continues.

    Scarlet-X #6
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Eren Ozkural's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    London/Istanbul
    Posts
    751
    Oh I'm sure as well. It couldn't have been easy to integrate speedgrade into cs6 as quick as they did in the first place. I think I'll slowly start to learn the ins and outs on non mission critical projects until the kinks are ironed out :)
    KINOTRIGGER
    Feature Films, Fashion Films, Photography, S3D, Pre/Post/Production.

    VIMEO YOUTUBE TWITTER
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Jim Hoffman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    589
    I think of it more as a look whats coming. Round tripping is not available yet. It also has to render to DPX files at this time. The way it will handle layers and the new approach to color and contrast looks very promising. Curves are no longer. It's brand new and has to mature quite a bit to become truly viable. I'm excited to watch and see what happens. Seems like they are moving quickly.
    Jim Hoffman
    Chicago, Illinois
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Mark Toia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane... But could be anywhere in the world today
    Posts
    3,114
    I thinks it in there best interest to get it round tripping sooner rather than later.... Before the adobe haters start killing its true potential with rumour.
    Mark Toia
    Director / DP / Founder of Zoom Film & Television

    RED EPIC M #456, RED EPIC X #612, RED EPIC X #1137, RED EPIC DRAGON #(coming Soon)

    www.toia.com

    www.zoomfilmtv.com.au
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member shashbugu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Eren Ozkural View Post
    I think Adobe purchasing Iridas and implementing Speedgrade into it's workflow is commendable but there's one feature in particular that's stopping me from going into that route:

    The "send to Speedgrade" option in Premiere should just open the original time line with original media, whatever the codec(s) like the "replace with After Effects Composition" feature. The reason why i'm over the moon with Adobe is because they've eliminated all transcoding to get into the edit. It's a shame to resort to a bottleneck during finishing.
    youvcan send out an edl or xml out if you want. Round tripping is the number one feature request in all adobe video apps. Dynamic link is far from dynamic. Speedgrade has been very stable for me using trial version. very fluid and stable.
    Wish they had a denoiser and 3d tracker.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member shashbugu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,219
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant H View Post
    Used it very briefly last night with some test footage (1080p 5DII material) and it crashed spectacularly half way through a grade. Wasted around 20 minutes but was a painful enough experience to have me question using it.
    unfortunately the worst footage on the planet for every application out there is 5D h264 footage. The programs all need to uncompress the h264 codec, even if done in the background like in PPro. its very heavy on the system. Thats why the 5Dmark 3 has the new intra frame codec, decompression is lighter making it more stable. if you can transcode to prores with grinder or whatever you will be fine eventhough this defeats the purpose of native editing or grading.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts