There's been quite a bit of discussion about it on the CML group (Cinematography.net). Many positive words about Red, and some back-and-forth debate on Alexa, F65, and the other contenders.
|
|
There's been quite a bit of discussion about it on the CML group (Cinematography.net). Many positive words about Red, and some back-and-forth debate on Alexa, F65, and the other contenders.
Did they release part two of the shootout yet?
My original writeup about the shootout: http://thetown-crier.blogspot.com/20...12-master.html
And My Update / Perspective On The Test: http://thetown-crier.blogspot.com/20...f-zacutos.html
I really appreciate and agree with David Mullens perspective and comments here. Thanks. :)
anybody heard any news or results about part 3 of this series? The side by side with as similar set ups as possible?
so where's all that big dynamic range advantage alexa/f65/f3 have over Red? I saw identical DR on epic compared to alexa/f65 and arguably superior DR to sony F3 in those equalized tests (talking about the newly released part 3)
So Question, I shot 2 shows on the red one why did the first chip look closer to film then the MX (I do love my MX)
any thoughts!!
you mean the Mysterium sensor looks closer to film than the Mysterium-X sensor? not sure that's the case, only thing I can say for that is due to the poorer color science and weaker dynamic range at the time, alot of older original Mysterium sensor shot projects tend to often have a more washed out or desaturated palette (tones burn out/clip faster and thus get diluted and not as rich looking, color-wise) and so with the advent of better DR and better color science a lot of Red MX stuff tended to go overboard and look overly rich perhaps to your eyes, in terms of saturation and such - that coupled with the ultra sharp resolution perhaps gave a more 'videoy' effect?
That's just my conjecture because Red MX definitely looks more film like than M to me and most people I would imagine
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |