Thread: electronic or mechanical shutter? consider this new concept.

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1 electronic or mechanical shutter? consider this new concept. 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Mechanical mirror shutters are useful if you want an optical viewfinder like in the Arri D21 or a mechanical shutter with a sissor action like in the Sony F65 but the disadvantages are the sweeping action, bulk, heavy weight and sucks power. there's some vibration and noise although minimised. they are very precise and are expensive to build. but the advantage of having them outweighs the costs. is there a better system. a system that is instant, small, light weight, draws minimum power, very fast, no noise, no vibration, cheap and placed in front of the OLPF ? what am i talking about? well, how about a LCD shutter? without the back light, of course, and at 2ms switching either on or off across the full frame in an instant capturing the image. sure they will have to be custom made and the crystals a little larger so they overlap when closed cutting out all light. surely the engineers can design this. i suppose one can call this a mechatronic shutter and base on the principal, it can work well. one can argue "well, there's one more refraction we have to consider in the optical path". but let the engineers work this out. if the glass is completely flat, thin and the liquid clear, then we are on our way to have this a reality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    https://vimeo.com/5976527

    It´s alive!!

    I think it´s an amazing concept, needs some serious develop.
    "¿Render?... beer time!
    two Epic-X, 24"FSI 10bits, 50"Panny, Some computers; Work as Colorist, DIT and Tech Counselor.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Member Benedict Heinzl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Vienna - Austria
    Posts
    49
    The Concept sounds amazing, but isn't there a problem with the LCD cristals?
    I think they will be visible, or they will at least affect the image quality.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Quote Originally Posted by Albert Chen View Post
    Mechanical mirror shutters are useful if you want an optical viewfinder like in the Arri D21 or a mechanical shutter with a sissor action like in the Sony F65 but the disadvantages are the sweeping action, bulk, heavy weight and sucks power. there's some vibration and noise although minimised. they are very precise and are expensive to build. but the advantage of having them outweighs the costs. is there a better system. a system that is instant, small, light weight, draws minimum power, very fast, no noise, no vibration, cheap and placed in front of the OLPF ? what am i talking about? well, how about a LCD shutter? without the back light, of course, and at 2ms switching either on or off across the full frame in an instant capturing the image. sure they will have to be custom made and the crystals a little larger so they overlap when closed cutting out all light. surely the engineers can design this. i suppose one can call this a mechatronic shutter and base on the principal, it can work well. one can argue "well, there's one more refraction we have to consider in the optical path". but let the engineers work this out. if the glass is completely flat, thin and the liquid clear, then we are on our way to have this a reality.
    There was some kind of 3rd party LCD shutter thing for a Red One if I remember correctly. It was supposed to be placed in a matte box though.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Yaque Silva-Doyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles area
    Posts
    390
    Could you not just build this in to the sensor's read reset logarithm? sort of a modified sign wave.
    Yaque

    Dos Rios Films
    http://dosriosfilms.com/
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Benedict,

    you are right that any thing in the optical path may be visible or affect the image. refraction changes, however small, happens when it's heavier or lighter than air. idea is to minimise it by making the glass flat, thin, the liquid clear and the crystals small in the LCD. Placement is also a very important issue. in a PL mount we have about 20 mm from the sensor to play with. the further away it is from the focal point, the lesser the interference. the engineers can produce them almost like glass. the can use the OLPF on one side and the IR on the other with the crystals sandwiched between.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,592
    I know who holds the patent for such a device. It's been toyed with but there are a host of other issues, such as polarization.
    Mitch Gross
    Applications Specialist
    AbelCine

    mitch@abelcine.com
    212-462-0100
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Well finally this is now a reality as posted by Jarred Land in his thread NAB13- RED MOTION MOUNT DATED 04-08-2013. but why call it a global shutter when the term is already used for a strictly electronic application. this new method is both electronic and mechanical. electronically triggered to mechanically block out the light path. the term "mechatronic shutter" as I wrote above, may better describe this. now that this is done, why not take it to the next level. I have another new idea and if done right, it will eliminate log tables. anyone interested? Cheers.
    Last edited by Albert Chen; 04-23-2013 at 07:46 PM. Reason: added a few more words
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts