Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Skyfall Trailer

Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 46 of 46
  1. #41  
    Senior Member Tim Whitcomb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    3,449
    I don't thing saturation is th right word... but its definitely another long line of overly TEAL AND ORANGE color pallets that Stu maschowtiz has been bemoaning for years....and since Im a story guy, uh, this looks like Bourne Identity starring James Bond :(
    Kind regards,

    Tim Whitcomb
    Filmmaker
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #42  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    21
    GIVE DEAKINS AN OSCAR! its beautiful
    Cinematographer - Compass College of Cinematic Arts, Grand Rapids, MI USA
    RED One MX SSD
    www.compass.edu

    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #43  
    Senior Member Bob Gundu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Toronto, ON Canada
    Posts
    3,720
    All that neon must have been ridiculous to shoot.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oINNi...layer_embedded
    ___________________________

    VFX, Cinematographer, Photographer
    10 frame handles
    Vimeo
    Scarlet #329 "HAL"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #44  
    Senior Member Simon Dunne's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    185
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1074638/technical

    Cinematographic process
    ARRIRAW (2.8K) (source format)
    Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
    Redcode RAW (5K) (source format) (aerial shots)

    Printed film format
    35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383)
    70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383)
    D-Cinema

    So let me get this right. Most of it was shot in 2.8K, scaled to 4K which was the master edit format, then they scaled down the 5K RED aerials, only to scale everything back up again for the DMR IMAX print??!?!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #45  
    Senior Member Jeffrey T. Morgan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon Dunne View Post
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1074638/technical

    Cinematographic process
    ARRIRAW (2.8K) (source format)
    Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
    Redcode RAW (5K) (source format) (aerial shots)

    Printed film format
    35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383)
    70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383)
    D-Cinema

    So let me get this right. Most of it was shot in 2.8K, scaled to 4K which was the master edit format, then they scaled down the 5K RED aerials, only to scale everything back up again for the DMR IMAX print??!?!

    Lol, this is a great question.
    Jeffrey T. Morgan
    Producer • Director • Cinematographer (Local 600) • Editor
    www.PrometheusMotionPictures.com . . . Twitter: (at) JeffreyTMorgan

    SCARLET-X #1633 "The Dark Knight", Now booking Michigan and Worldwide
    Canon and PL Mount, 5" Touch LCD, RedRock FF and Mattebox, Cartoni Delta Head, Contax Zeiss lenses and much more
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #46  
    I really don't see a problem with that. I'm sure the arials are a small percentage of the movie.
    A 4k master is the gold standard.
    Doing a version of the film catering to the arials seems like a huge waste of time and money.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts