Anyone using the 24-105 on the scarlet? Any thoughts to share about this lens?
Are you finding it fast enough most of the time?
|
|
Anyone using the 24-105 on the scarlet? Any thoughts to share about this lens?
Are you finding it fast enough most of the time?
Last edited by Mestizo Devon; 05-23-2012 at 12:09 PM. Reason: correction
I've used it on my Epic and C300, mainly when I need to roll light and handheld outdoors. I love it for that kind of shooting. Indoors, it's not my first choice on the Epic.
It is one of Canon's best mid-range zooms (beats the 24-70 2.8) and one of their best kept secrets. It isn't a constant F4 though, it will drop down a bit at the long end.
Another lens to consider...if you want great manual focus and Zeiss look...is the Contax 28-85 3.3-F4.
One of the sharpest still zooms ever made, and incredibly smooth and buttery feel to it.
Ryan De Franco shot most of this music video on it:
https://vimeo.com/37192626
Use it all the time. Every now and again I wish for a little more light indoors when I'm on the long end of the lens. I like it so much more then the 24-70 f/2.8. The IS is really good and useful to have as well.
Which is better to pair with canon 70-200 2.8
the 24-105L
Or zeiss 35 f2
I mean presumably the Canon 24-105 will "pair" better with the 70-200 than a Zeiss will. Canon and Zeiss glass have different "feels". IMHO.
True, they do have different feels to them.
Give a little take little.....
Whats the consensus on the 16-35 2.8 version one?
I can't seem to keep a steady relationship with my lens choices
You should think about what you're going to do. ;) The 16-35 and the 24-105 are very different lenses, both are good for what they are. With the 24-105L you'll get a lot more zoom-range and IS, which is a big plus for handheld shooting. I've bought this as my first lens, i was surprised by its performance, i didn't expected it to be that good. It's a great start, you'll have a good all-around lens, and it will be good enough for lots of situations, especially if you want to carry around only one lens.
Of course, its not made for everything, i sometimes miss more wide-angle and for indoor/lowlight it could be a bit faster. But you can't have everything, the 24-105 offers a lot for its low price-tag and if IS is usefull for you, there aren't many other options. I've chosen this lens over the 24-70 2.8 and i think it was a good choice.
My next lenses will be primes and maybe i'll add the 16-35 to my kit too.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |