Thread: Canon 24-105 f4

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1 Canon 24-105 f4 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    325
    Anyone using the 24-105 on the scarlet? Any thoughts to share about this lens?
    Are you finding it fast enough most of the time?
    Last edited by Mestizo Devon; 05-23-2012 at 12:09 PM. Reason: correction
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Stephen Mick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    494
    I've used it on my Epic and C300, mainly when I need to roll light and handheld outdoors. I love it for that kind of shooting. Indoors, it's not my first choice on the Epic.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    It is one of Canon's best mid-range zooms (beats the 24-70 2.8) and one of their best kept secrets. It isn't a constant F4 though, it will drop down a bit at the long end.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,765
    Another lens to consider...if you want great manual focus and Zeiss look...is the Contax 28-85 3.3-F4.

    One of the sharpest still zooms ever made, and incredibly smooth and buttery feel to it.

    Ryan De Franco shot most of this music video on it:

    https://vimeo.com/37192626
    ___________
    Nick Morrison
    Director, Producer, Writer (WGA-East)
    ASTRONAUT (Partner)
    www.astronautnyc.com
    www.nickmorrison.tv

    ASTRONAUT CAMERAS: Two Scarlets
    LENSES: Contax Multi-Cam Prime & Zoom Set (Leitaxed and RP Cine-Modded)
    POST: Avid Symphony Edit Suite, RRocket (x2)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member William Robinette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    177
    Use it all the time. Every now and again I wish for a little more light indoors when I'm on the long end of the lens. I like it so much more then the 24-70 f/2.8. The IS is really good and useful to have as well.
    William Robinette
    Scarlet-X #29
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    325
    Which is better to pair with canon 70-200 2.8
    the 24-105L
    Or zeiss 35 f2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,765
    I mean presumably the Canon 24-105 will "pair" better with the 70-200 than a Zeiss will. Canon and Zeiss glass have different "feels". IMHO.
    ___________
    Nick Morrison
    Director, Producer, Writer (WGA-East)
    ASTRONAUT (Partner)
    www.astronautnyc.com
    www.nickmorrison.tv

    ASTRONAUT CAMERAS: Two Scarlets
    LENSES: Contax Multi-Cam Prime & Zoom Set (Leitaxed and RP Cine-Modded)
    POST: Avid Symphony Edit Suite, RRocket (x2)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    325
    True, they do have different feels to them.
    Give a little take little.....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    325
    Whats the consensus on the 16-35 2.8 version one?
    I can't seem to keep a steady relationship with my lens choices
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dresden, Germany
    Posts
    538
    You should think about what you're going to do. ;) The 16-35 and the 24-105 are very different lenses, both are good for what they are. With the 24-105L you'll get a lot more zoom-range and IS, which is a big plus for handheld shooting. I've bought this as my first lens, i was surprised by its performance, i didn't expected it to be that good. It's a great start, you'll have a good all-around lens, and it will be good enough for lots of situations, especially if you want to carry around only one lens.

    Of course, its not made for everything, i sometimes miss more wide-angle and for indoor/lowlight it could be a bit faster. But you can't have everything, the 24-105 offers a lot for its low price-tag and if IS is usefull for you, there aren't many other options. I've chosen this lens over the 24-70 2.8 and i think it was a good choice.

    My next lenses will be primes and maybe i'll add the 16-35 to my kit too.
    Scarlet-X #1388
    Canon 24/1.4IIL 50/1.2L 85/1.2IIL 24-105/4.0L | Sigma 35/1.4A
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts