Click here to go to the first RED TEAM post in this thread.   Thread: Red Epic Operations Guide (955-002_v3.0 Rev-C)

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 Red Epic Operations Guide (955-002_v3.0 Rev-C) 
    Member Antony Newman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    London, Canary Wharf
    Posts
    81
    I've read through the doc - noticed a few trivial typos:


    [page 3] "Torx is a registered trademark of Textron" <-listed twice at bottom of page

    [page 47] Raw Clip Level Bar: (Q) Does this mean that a full bar represents >= half pixels in the image are clipping?


    [page 62] "have advanced settings and" <- the sentence after this has been deleted .


    [page 63] "SENSATIVITY" <- Sensitivity


    [page 224] "Back focus adjustment" ..."BEFORE TO PERFORM" <- Remove the word 'TO'


    [page 229] Vertical Dimension 46.74 <- Guess this should be 146.74


    AJ

    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Member Antony Newman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    London, Canary Wharf
    Posts
    81
    One thought as I was reading the manual (I don't have an EPIC yet / ie complete newbie) - relating to effect of colour fidelity in low light.

    +) Each RGB photosite on the sensor must be hit by a number of photons to register a change (sensitivity).
    +) As light reduces to almost zero we hit the point that some photosites have more photons that hit than others.
    +) This fluctuation in white light causes colour change noise.
    +) If a greater number of RGB points in the bayer pattern can be summed perfectly, then colour accuracy will improve (at the expense of image resolution).

    My question is this: The minimum compression of the REDCODE is 3:1. If the compression was removed, (or a lower compression was available - eg 2:1), would we be able to more accurately add luma values, and create a lower resolution image with higher colour fidelity?

    ---

    2nd thought: If the ASIC that does the discreet cosine transformation consumes a lot of power ... maybe this step could be avoided? Photographers would get a more detail in their images, and the battery life might increase?

    AJ
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3.   This is the last RED TEAM post in this thread.   #3  
    Thank you for the great feedback, Antony. I have relayed this valuable information to our technical writer for review and to make the appropriate changes. If you have any additional feedback, please send directly to opsguides@red.com.

    All the best,

    NICK
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts