Thread: Redmag SSD Reader USB 3.0 version with new USB 3.0 capable macs?

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1 Redmag SSD Reader USB 3.0 version with new USB 3.0 capable macs? 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,054
    Has anyone tested this combo and what kind of speeds were you getting with the USB 3.0 bus on the new macs? Just curious if anyone can confirm compatiblity and worthwhile speeds.

    Thanks!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    58
    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/apple/prob...macbooks/13188

    I want to get one of the usb3 sdd readers but they are back ordered... Now I might wait to see what happens with this...
    600 DIT / Professional Warranty Voider
    INFAMOUSPRO.NET - R1/EPIC/2PERF/GLASS/TRANCODES/MICRO BREWS
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    251
    I've tested the RedMag USB 2.0 Reader on the Retina MacBook Pro (35MB/s) and had no problems mounting external USB 3.0 drives (100 (MB/s).

    http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthr...nal-Elgato-SSD

    Just ordered a bunch of USB 3.0 drives for backups and will buy a TB-FW adapter for the RedMag Reader. I wonder if the RedMag USB 3.0 version is faster than 100MB/s and bus-powered otherwise I'll wait for the thunderbolt version.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    80
    I use the new USB 3.0 mini RED Station on my PC laptop on shoots, and I can get around 120/MB sustained to the internal SSD, or even another USB3 spinning disk. It's as fast as eSATA on the older Station, in my experience.
    -Nick Timmons
    Pamoramic Digital Cinema
    Epic-M #1290 'Ruth'
    Brooklyn, NY
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Nick Shaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Timmons View Post
    I use the new USB 3.0 mini RED Station on my PC laptop on shoots, and I can get around 120/MB sustained to the internal SSD, or even another USB3 spinning disk. It's as fast as eSATA on the older Station, in my experience.
    I can download at about 170-180MB/s using the eSATA RED STATION REDMAG 1.8" (MINI), so 120MB/s sounds a bit disappointing.
    Nick Shaw, London, UK
    editor/compositor/workflow consultant
    TA at REDucation UK

    REDlogFilm™ to REDgamma™/REDgamma2™/REDgamma3™ LUTs for FCP, Resolve and Color available from www.antlerpost.com/plugins
    Other formats on request
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Not all USB3 hosts are equal. The one in the new Apple systems is the USB3 header integrated into the new Intel chipsets. So will essentially be the same on all the new Ivy Bridge based PC notebooks hitting the market.

    My retina MBP is en-route, I think I get it Thursday. Can't comment about USB3 RED Station though... Not now, not when I get the system. I don't own one. I need to order a couple, but I keep forgetting and they're out of stock.

    RED SSD readers connected via eSATA to a good host like an ATTO H680 or CalDigit 6GU3 can read SSDs at 250MB/s+ if you have fast enough storage to copy to. I have an H680 in a Sonnet Thunderbolt expander and I can get about 250MB/s from the SSD onto an internal SSD in my 2011 MBP systems or to another SATA device that's fast enough with that setup. The SSD's appear to be based on 3Gbps SATA interface, so we're pretty much hitting the limit there.

    I'm hoping the USB3 reader can get close to that... But USB3 is kinda bloated and laggy, some devices don't always play 100% nice with each other or properly negotiate the SuperSpeed mode.
    Last edited by Jeff Kilgroe; 06-25-2012 at 08:13 AM.
    - Jeff Kilgroe
    - Applied Visual Technologies, LLC | RojoMojo
    - EPIC-M Package Available! Over 1TB SSD media, RPP's & more.


    List of all current RED software tools.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Stephen Lovett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Silicon Valley CA
    Posts
    584
    I just got my Caldigit 6G3U as they have been on backorder forever and are now back in stock.

    I haven't had a chance to do extensive testing as it just showed up yesterday, but the 6G3U is an interesting test bed as it allows the same card to directly compare an esata RED station connected to a 6G sata card with a USB 3 RED station on the same card, same slot, same machine.

    I installed it in the machine on a DIT cart which has a 2008 MacPro tower in it.

    Preliminary results are pretty much what you'd expect.

    Just under to just over 200MBs speeds with the esata interface beating out the USB3 by about 10%

    If I had to summarize at this point I'd say if you are looking to move to USB 3.0 from esata for a major speed bump, you should save your money.

    That said the USB 3 connector is much more robust, particularly in the field and can provide bus power. When you marry this with the smaller form factor of the mini the USB 3.0 reader is a great fit for a mobile solution and is certainly going to be faster that firewire.

    On some high end laptops that have both connections on a separate bus if you put your reader on USB 3 and your drive an esata you could see some practical benefit.

    Given my mobile solution is the Promise R12 and a firmtek reader which is about in the same speed range as above, I'm not going to see a major performance benefit when I move to another 6G3U mounted in the second slot of the Sonnet Pro TB enclosure for my rocket, but the connection will be far less temperamental than an express card esata solution with two rather iffy connection points.

    Horses for courses as per usual :-)
    Uroboros Films Turning Vision Into Reality www.uroborosfilms.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Jarek Zabczynski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Poughkeepsie, NY
    Posts
    1,115
    The SATA interface was never meant to be external. Reason enough to move to USB3 if possible. Personally, I hold my breath anytime I have to use eSATA for anything.
    Shoot for the Impossible...Then do it.

    Jarek Zabczynski
    Director / Editor / Cinematographer


    Scarlet X - #525 | Epic X - #??? | www.jarek.com | WE'LL BE ALRIGHT (Music Video) | INCREDIBLE (Scarlet Music Video)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,054
    I've always found the Mac implementation of USB 2.0 to be slow and crappy.I always use Sata and Esata for all data buses.Was thinking I could use one THunderB for a rocket and one to handle esata drives for offload, and if I'm lucky USB 3.0 for ingest.I guess time will tell whether I should stay Customac or try to go Retina on 'em.Certainly the new retina mbp seems to have enough throughput for alternative camera workflows.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Remember most consumer single volume drives are still 3Gb/s and won't write faster than 115-120 MB/s, but some of the newer single volume enterprise and consumer drives are 6Gb/s and you'll get 180+ MB/s with 6Gb eSATA or USB3 connections. But you should probably backup to at least a raid5 tower/unit of some kind, which should be well over 200 MB/s anyway.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts