Ultranon/Leonetti Superspeeds?

[Stephen Williams]

I sold Matt one of my 2 cameras along with a 24 / 35 / 50 & 135 Ultranon lenses. They are rehoused Contax Zeiss glass, which is very close to Superspeeds. The 24 -135 cover FF35mm the 18mm does not cover 5k , there is also a 15mm which I have never seen.

I still have an 18mm, 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm & 135mm that I will be using tomorrow on an Omega commercial, shooting 35mm Kodak 5213 with a Fries Mitchell.

Not sure what I will do with the other Ultracam body, I had 2 of 15 built.

[Nick Gardner]

The k35s are excellent lenses. Honestly, I wouldn't rent mine out as they are too rare and difficult to replace if some guy trashes one. I would certainly take them over a set of super speeds. To be fair, 2.8 is the new 1.4. There is almost nothing I shoot at screaming wide open, unless I am trying to get super shallow depth of field because the director has a hard on for "the 5d look". The new fast cameras make 2.8 a totally useable stop. If you can find a set of the Kinor 35 style lomo standards, they are pretty great lenses. I really like the way they look, and they are nice and contrasty. The kinor styles can be converted to PL without being sent anywhere, you can just buy the mount from SPB sale. The 22 is a great lens, the 28 is good, I don't like the 35mm, but that may just be mine, the 50 is great and I love the hundred. Late 80's early 90s are the way to go. This is the lens series I am talking about -
https://sites.google.com/site/olexse...f-cine-cameras
It's just the standard speeds that are easy to convert, the superspeeds need to go away.

Nick

[Clint Lealos]

Hey Mike, I own a set of both Mk I super speeds and K35s, but the K35s are still in BNCR mount for now. I agree with what everyone has said so far, and I also think you have the right idea with going for Mk IIs if you plan on renting them. However, here are my thoughts of the Mk Is vs. K35s:

I love them both equally! The biggest difference is that triangular bokeh in the Mk Is. Once you stop down past 2.8 the 3 blade iris design makes the bokeh very triangular and only gets more so as you stop down further. I once had a shot with a Seagulls in the background, but they looked like little triangles in the sky... very distracting. Luckily, wide open they are almost circular and stopped down a little they still have a very pleasing (to me anyway) football shaped bokeh. The K35s have the nicest bokeh ever! Really, its perfectly circular wide open.

They both have issues wide open, but I can't say one is better or worse than the other wide open. Just different. The Mk Is can have a really crazy (in a bad way) flare wide open. It changes color and looks terrible, but I rarely come across it. You have to pointed at the sun or a big ass HMI to get this weird flare. But the K35s have their own weird thing wide open. Maybe its just my lens, but on my last shoot the out of focus areas in the foreground looked more smudged than out of focus. Not sure how to explain it, but I didn't like it. Stopped down just a touch and all was good. Both loose contrast wide open and both flare much easier, but the Mk Is flare a lot easier.

K35s have an aperture of T1.3 - T22 (except the 24 and 18 are both T1.5 - T22). The Mk Is have T1.4 - T11. I think the second number is the bigger difference here. T11... sucks.

K35s focus rotation is all over the map. Every lens has a different focus throw. The smallest is the 35mm with a 90 degree rotation, while the 55mm and 85mm both have about a 270 degree rotation from my rough eyeball estimate. The Mk Is are consistently 180 degrees across the set, so they win in that department for my purposes.

K35s also have a tiny little lip on the front of the lens that makes it impossible or at least terribly precarious to clip on a matte box. My Samcine rehoused Mk Is have a nice fat solid front to clamp on to.

The K35s are longer, but I'm not convinced they are heavier than my set of Mk Is. I don't have a scale handy, but I'll try to weigh them as well.

I don't think I'll ever sell either set, because I really do love them. I could never choose which one to sell! They both have so much character and fun little quirks. That is what appeals to me about old glass... the happy and lucky accident will happen every once and while because of those lenses and Master Primes don't have accidents :)

I think no matter what you decide, it will be the right decision. Good luck!

[Nick Gardner]

Hey Clint, here's a tip - put a 77mm filter ring (a quality one) on the front of the k35s. It's exactly 80mms and makes the front have more surface area for a clip on MB and with a standard MB the iris isn't buried in the reflex prevention ring. I used haze filters that I busted out with a bunch and cleaned out the glass. I tried cheap chinese filters but they save a tenth of a penny by making them a little skinnier than the fancy ones.

ALso, SPB sales did my BNCR to PL conversions and they did a nice job and were affordable.

nick

[Clint Lealos]

Hey Clint, here's a tip - put a 77mm filter ring (a quality one) on the front of the k35s. It's exactly 80mms and makes the front have more surface area for a clip on MB and with a standard MB the iris isn't buried in the reflex prevention ring. I used haze filters that I busted out with a bunch and cleaned out the glass. I tried cheap chinese filters but they save a tenth of a penny by making them a little skinnier than the fancy ones.

ALso, SPB sales did my BNCR to PL conversions and they did a nice job and were affordable.

nick

Nice tip! That will come in handy :) Thanks.

[Stephen Williams]

I asked for some information on this set: http://www.benl.ebay.be/itm/ws/eBayI...#ht_500wt_1413

This is the info I received: They cover Super 35mm. 18mm T1.9, 24mm T1.4, 28mm T1.8, 35mm T1.4, 50mm T1.4, 85mm T1.4, 135mm T1.8.

Wow they look expensive! Matt did well!
The 24-135 all have 16 iris blades so the bokeh is round at all stops, the 18 has way less & does not have round bokeh

[Martin Schneider]

Thanks for the info so far, still nothing really solid.

Yes, I believe 'Poltergeist' was indeed shot on them.

Pretty sure Poltergeist was shot Anamorphic on JDC-Lenses...

[George A.]

Hi,

The Canon K35 are simply amazing.

We have two sets and they rent constantly.

Sharper than Zeiss Superspeeds, especially when used wide open (however, paired with ISO 800 etc, there's less and less reason to use them wide-open). They cover full frame (36mm x 24mm)!
Compact and light.

We shot both 35mm film, RED ONE, RED EPIC and ALEXA with the K35 and they are stunning, very cinematic. They really match unbelievably well with digital sensors.

The only very slight drawback is the shorter focus throw of the 35mm prime, but we use a different follow focus gear with the Arri FF-4 - no problem. And it's not that bad by any means.
Other than that, we love everything about them: character, sharpness, bokeh (amazing due to the 14-blade iris), size, weight.... and the list goes on.

I can tell you that, if 2-3 years ago many DPs were not so familiar with the K35s, they really, really took off in the last year or so. Everybody wants to shoot them nowadays, we are getting calls from all over the country, especially from DPs shooting on EPICs and ALEXAs. As I said, they really shine on those cameras.

Once Monstro (larger sensor) comes out, the K35s will continue to match the EPIC perfectly - no portholing, no vignetting of any kind.

George

P.S. By the way - the lenses are so small than one can use 3x3 filters on them without vignetting, even in 5K! We use Arri LMB-2 with 3 stages (!), two 3x3s and one Series 9, and there's no vignetting whatsoever. This whole combo keeps the EPIC unbelievably small - truly the IMAX power in a package smaller than Super16.

P.S. 2 -- Wanted to take some pics for this thread, but to prove my point, both sets are out at the moment!

[Clint Lealos]

the lenses are so small than one can use 3x3 filters on them without vignetting, even in 5K! We use Arri LMB-2 with 3 stages (!), two 3x3s and one Series 9, and there's no vignetting whatsoever. This whole combo keeps the EPIC unbelievably small - truly the IMAX power in a package smaller than Super16.

I always wondered if that LMB-2 would cover those lenses... now if I can just find one with filters :)

[Nick Morrison]

Wow they look expensive! Matt did well!
The 24-135 all have 16 iris blades so the bokeh is round at all stops, the 18 has way less & does not have round bokeh

Wow that's interesting. That means that in the conversion, these Contax lenses had new iris blades fitted. Contax glass normally has 6 bladed irises. Also the 24mm is interesting, as Contax only made a 25mm (2.8). Maybe they made some adjustements? Cool set.