|
|
No because you need at least 3 copies to even be insurable for project completion (read your insurance contract). So 300$. Plus physical storage of said media (at some point, shelf space is something, especially in places like my neighborhood where 1000 sq feet rents at $2500 a month or more, (places like Toronto, New York, Tokyo are even higher) Then you have the issue sof projects spread out over San after San raid - you eventually have a clogged system.
Yes but it also shows what crunchy and ugly bokeh and focus-falloff wide-angle lenses - cheated on this camera as normal view lenses - have. Also shows how awful an untrained Steadicam op can be. :-) Only shost with very deep depth of field look OK, and in all cases colour science looks way wonky - almost as bad as that Chinese camera.
Last edited by Rob Ruffo; 08-09-2012 at 06:32 AM.
MAny ASC D.P.s of high note rate the MX at 13 stops, that Alexa at 14.25. The "chip manufacturer" in China cannot be trusted. Do you also believe that cheap LCD TVs at Best Buy have 10 000 000:1 contrast ratios? It should be noted that super high res files like 4K and 5K can be much more effectively noise reduced - so add a few more stops at the bottom end not possible if all you have is 2K to give Neat Video.
"Pro Video Coalition" is a prosumer corporate video site and those tests were a complete joke by any measure. I think I'll go with the A.S.C. guys.
People reacted the same way when the first DSLRs introduced raw stills to a public used to shooting film. Now, even the cheapest DSLRs have raw stills. Withholding features "condescendingly" (ie "don't give it to them, they won't know what to do with it") is not the answer. Toss people in the deep end and they'll learn to swim, I say.
I think this is a great camera for students, the fact that you get all those features for what I paid for an HVX 6 years ago or so. The fact that you WILL need to grade on a regular basis will make sure students are somewhat forced to get the practice they need, couple that with learning how lenses and sensor sizes coincide with eachother. If BM came out with a good ranged zoom specifically for this camera that would also help, I imagine it will kind of be like when the dslr wave started (shorts full of CU's). I think this is in a market that is below RED and shouldn't effect them too much, the people buying RED's would see this and know that it's features wouldn't suffice for what we want. All in all though, it's a pretty damn good image for the $$.
Well said, Nicholas. For personal (nary financed) projects, this will be an imminently useful tool, for the price!
Just an update: actual raw footage was posted recently (today?) on John Brawley's site. The "RAWness" work like stills (recovery, clarity, fill, etc.) and is a really great, straight-foward implementation. It seems to recover a hell of a lot of "overexposed" material...
I am thinking about still buying one even tho I just spent like 15k on red gear.. first world problems lol...
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |