Thread: Black Magic Design Cinema Camera - update

Closed Thread
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 345678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 77
  1. #61  
    Quote Originally Posted by Timur Civan View Post
    I feel the no budget crowd will get tired of having to grade every freaking shot. The beauty of the gh2 7d is that they make"good" really easy.
    I use a 5d and I love grading every shot :) I despise the baked-in picture styles that make everything super contrasty and cheap looking
     

  2. #62  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by David Rasberry View Post
    That's a $100 hard drive for backup these days. Cheap media.
    No because you need at least 3 copies to even be insurable for project completion (read your insurance contract). So 300$. Plus physical storage of said media (at some point, shelf space is something, especially in places like my neighborhood where 1000 sq feet rents at $2500 a month or more, (places like Toronto, New York, Tokyo are even higher) Then you have the issue sof projects spread out over San after San raid - you eventually have a clogged system.
     

  3. #63  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Joseph Podlesnik View Post
    Here's another update on the Black Magic Cinema cam, for any folks who might be curious - http://vimeo.com/47013561 There's some decent dynamic range in the shot at 3:40.
    Yes but it also shows what crunchy and ugly bokeh and focus-falloff wide-angle lenses - cheated on this camera as normal view lenses - have. Also shows how awful an untrained Steadicam op can be. :-) Only shost with very deep depth of field look OK, and in all cases colour science looks way wonky - almost as bad as that Chinese camera.
    Last edited by Rob Ruffo; 08-09-2012 at 06:32 AM.
     

  4. #64  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe G. View Post
    "It has higher dynamic range? I thought Scarlet/Epic was 13.5 and BM was 13."

    The last I heard, the MX sensor tested at 11.9 stops:

    http://provideocoalition.com/index.p...-_scce_charts/

    Is there some independent test that confirms this increase to 13.5?

    The BM is somewhere between 13 and 14 (correction, the sensor manufacturer, I believe claims 15 for the sensor in optimal conditions), and the camera hasn't released yet. We shall see. I have no problem putting my faith in the new Dragon sensor, with 15 stops claimed. But I like the highlight rolloff on the BM best right now.
    MAny ASC D.P.s of high note rate the MX at 13 stops, that Alexa at 14.25. The "chip manufacturer" in China cannot be trusted. Do you also believe that cheap LCD TVs at Best Buy have 10 000 000:1 contrast ratios? It should be noted that super high res files like 4K and 5K can be much more effectively noise reduced - so add a few more stops at the bottom end not possible if all you have is 2K to give Neat Video.

    "Pro Video Coalition" is a prosumer corporate video site and those tests were a complete joke by any measure. I think I'll go with the A.S.C. guys.
     

  5. #65  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    2,493
    Quote Originally Posted by Timur Civan View Post
    I feel the no budget crowd will get tired of having to grade every freaking shot. The beauty of the gh2 7d is that they make"good" really easy.
    Easy if your set time costs nothing. You are wasting time grading on set (and probably quite badly) with baked cameras.
     

  6. #66  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Timur Civan View Post
    I feel the no budget crowd will get tired of having to grade every freaking shot. The beauty of the gh2 7d is that they make"good" really easy.
    People reacted the same way when the first DSLRs introduced raw stills to a public used to shooting film. Now, even the cheapest DSLRs have raw stills. Withholding features "condescendingly" (ie "don't give it to them, they won't know what to do with it") is not the answer. Toss people in the deep end and they'll learn to swim, I say.
     

  7. #67  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    25
    I think this is a great camera for students, the fact that you get all those features for what I paid for an HVX 6 years ago or so. The fact that you WILL need to grade on a regular basis will make sure students are somewhat forced to get the practice they need, couple that with learning how lenses and sensor sizes coincide with eachother. If BM came out with a good ranged zoom specifically for this camera that would also help, I imagine it will kind of be like when the dslr wave started (shorts full of CU's). I think this is in a market that is below RED and shouldn't effect them too much, the people buying RED's would see this and know that it's features wouldn't suffice for what we want. All in all though, it's a pretty damn good image for the $$.
     

  8. #68  
    Well said, Nicholas. For personal (nary financed) projects, this will be an imminently useful tool, for the price!
     

  9. #69  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,378
    Just an update: actual raw footage was posted recently (today?) on John Brawley's site. The "RAWness" work like stills (recovery, clarity, fill, etc.) and is a really great, straight-foward implementation. It seems to recover a hell of a lot of "overexposed" material...
     

  10. #70  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stamford CT
    Posts
    971
    I am thinking about still buying one even tho I just spent like 15k on red gear.. first world problems lol...
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts