Thread: Supercardioid condenser vs shotgun for interior dialogue+instrument(piano-guitar)

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 Supercardioid condenser vs shotgun for interior dialogue+instrument(piano-guitar) 
    Senior Member James B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    121
    For an upcoming project I need to use just one boom mounted mic.
    I need to choose between a supercardioid condenser like the Sennheiser MKH50, or a shotgun like the Sennheiser MKH 416.

    Which would work best?

    Would either be a good choice if you could only own 1 microphone?
    My latest work
    [twitter] eco_bach
    --------------------------------------------
    "...all improvisation is life in search of a style."
    - Bruce Mau,'LifeStyle'
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member David W. Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    La Petite Roche
    Posts
    782
    I own both, And it really depends on the environment, size, reflectivity of the space.
    David W. Jones

    www.joneshdfilms.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Chatsworthless, CA
    Posts
    1,830
    Quote Originally Posted by James B. View Post
    For an upcoming project I need to use just one boom mounted mic. I need to choose between a supercardioid condenser like the Sennheiser MKH50, or a shotgun like the Sennheiser MKH 416.
    To me, that's kind of like asking, "I can only afford to buy one lens for my camera. Which one should I buy?"

    There's so many qualifying circumstances, no one answer will apply to everyone. In exteriors, a shotgun is probably better. In noisy, dialog-hostile locations, I think a wireless lav may work better; in small, quiet interiors, a hypercardioid like the MKH50 or MKH40 will probably work better.

    To me, a lot of it is about the room, the nature of the shot, and how close you can get the microphone to the actor. Having a good boom op will solve 50% of the problems. But the acoustics affect so much of it, there are no hard and fast rules.

    Having said that: the 416 has pretty much been the standard boom microphone for 25 years. I don't like it for most interiors, but it's a good workhorse shotgun. I actually prefer its younger brother, the MKH60, which is a little bit smaller and lighter (as is the newest replacement, the 8060).
    www.cinesound.tv | location sound / post-production consultant
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,378
    MKH50/Super-cardioid. The only problem is that you'll have to get the mic closer to the source outdoors, but a shotgun indoors generally doesn't work as well as a super-cardioid does outdoors (assuming you're getting close to the source), so that makes it the lowest common denominator in my opinion. That's been my experience anyway, but bare in mind I'm not a pro sound guy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    If you have the dough, Schoeps MK4 cardioid or MK41 hyper cardioid.
    I have a 416, but the Schoeps is much more natural sounding and
    has as much reach with the MK41 cap.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Chatsworthless, CA
    Posts
    1,830
    There is also the Schoeps CMIT, which has almost as much reach as a shotgun but more of the characteristic sound of a 641. Great mike, but very costly ($2000+).
    www.cinesound.tv | location sound / post-production consultant
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts