Thread: Platinum IRNDs on Epic = BAD

Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 51 to 58 of 58
  1. #51  
    Senior Member Phil Holland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,313
    Yeah. That's weird isn't it? I was waiting on some folks to publish that test a while ago. I've mentioned it on Reduser elsewhere, but......

    After extensive (and boy do I mean extensive) testing I can recommend two IR/ND solutions for Mysterium-X sensors.


    They are:

    - Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filters - (filmtools link)
    - Formatt Hot Mirror/Neutral Density Filers - (B&H link)

    The Tiffens come in the range of 0.3-2.1. The Formatts go from 0.3-2.4.

    As of this day, 04/23/2013, the Tiffen HMIRND provide the "best" possible image out of camera with the Mysterium-X under daylight and tungsten. The Formatts are close though and a bit cheaper for the set.

    I had a full set of Formatt HMND filters in 77mm screw on and 4x5.65. The 77mm work well on still lenses. My Formatts 4x5.65s were magically transported away from me recently. At the end of next week I'm ordering a range of Tiffen HMIRND glass.


    Dragon Thoughts: The new Red Dragon sensor and bodies will have enhanced IR protection through a new IR-OLPF design. Once I have a Dragon in my hand I will test literally everything all over again. It's said that we may not need IR protection due to the new tech, but until the testing is done we can't know for sure. For Dragon we'll likely be looking for filtration needs in the 0.03-3.0 range, which is nice because the Motion Mount covers exactly that range and everything in between. I'm sure the IR-OLPF will help or solve the IR pollution (or perhaps some combination of the new color science may assist with this). Where I'm concerned is deep filtration like 1.8-3.0.

    Expect some fairly thorough tests again soon.
    Phil Holland - Cinematographer - Los Angeles
    ________________________________
    phfx.com IMDB

    Scarlet-X #316 "Skully"
    Data Sheets and Notes: Epic M & X, Scarlet X & Red Dragon
    Red Quick Reference Guide (link to 52MB PDF)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #52  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    817
    Thanks, Phil. I also have found Rosco IR Trucolor filter to work great on my Epic-X
    Red Epic-X #00517 - Epic-Dragon Soon (Early adopter place in line)
    Carl Zeiss Super Speeds T1.3 Mark II - 18 / 25 / 35 / 50 / 85 / 120 T3.0 / 180 T3.0
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #53  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    3,290
    Thanks Phil!

    So the new Formatt ProStops didn't claim the crown despite their paper superiority - or were they not part of the test?

    Best
    Eric
    Director/Digital Camera Operator/2nd AC/DIT/Data Manager
    London, UK.

    Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #54  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Toronto / Chicago
    Posts
    156
    Question: With the IRND combo filters ... Is there any issues with stacking? Technically you are doubling up on the IR .
    Scarlet #2291, Pix240
    DanaDolly
    tedparkes@rogers.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #55  
    Senior Member Eric Haase's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    615
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Holland View Post
    Yeah. That's weird isn't it? I was waiting on some folks to publish that test a while ago. I've mentioned it on Reduser elsewhere, but......

    After extensive (and boy do I mean extensive) testing I can recommend two IR/ND solutions for Mysterium-X sensors.


    They are:

    - Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filters - (filmtools link)
    - Formatt Hot Mirror/Neutral Density Filers - (B&H link)

    The Tiffens come in the range of 0.3-2.1. The Formatts go from 0.3-2.4.

    As of this day, 04/23/2013, the Tiffen HMIRND provide the "best" possible image out of camera with the Mysterium-X under daylight and tungsten. The Formatts are close though and a bit cheaper for the set.

    I had a full set of Formatt HMND filters in 77mm screw on and 4x5.65. The 77mm work well on still lenses. My Formatts 4x5.65s were magically transported away from me recently. At the end of next week I'm ordering a range of Tiffen HMIRND glass.


    Dragon Thoughts: The new Red Dragon sensor and bodies will have enhanced IR protection through a new IR-OLPF design. Once I have a Dragon in my hand I will test literally everything all over again. It's said that we may not need IR protection due to the new tech, but until the testing is done we can't know for sure. For Dragon we'll likely be looking for filtration needs in the 0.03-3.0 range, which is nice because the Motion Mount covers exactly that range and everything in between. I'm sure the IR-OLPF will help or solve the IR pollution (or perhaps some combination of the new color science may assist with this). Where I'm concerned is deep filtration like 1.8-3.0.

    Expect some fairly thorough tests again soon.
    I've achieved the best results with the Tiffen IRND Hot Mirror combo.
    Eric
    cinematographer
    www.ericjhaase.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #56  
    Senior Member Phil Holland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,313
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Parkes View Post
    Question: With the IRND combo filters ... Is there any issues with stacking? Technically you are doubling up on the IR .
    Don't stack IRNDs or any Hot Mirror/ND solution. It's not good.

    However, you can stack regular NDs in front of a Hot Mirror/ND if you must.

    The allure of Hot Mirror NDs for me comes from having not much glass in front of your lens, which to me is important on high resolution imaging systems.

    So you can see why I'm all excited about Red's Motion Mount. And I'm not even talking about the global shutter, motion blur, strobe fixes that it also provides besides a built in ND. I won't be getting rid of my matte box when I get the Motion Mount because I still need eyebrows/flags, but I'm really excited about all the pros that come from this tiny dynamo.


    Quote Originally Posted by ericyoung View Post
    So the new Formatt ProStops didn't claim the crown despite their paper superiority - or were they not part of the test?
    I need to take a closer look at these, but a friend sent me two images he shot on an Epic with them and I'd still say the Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filters provide the most color accurate solution.
    Phil Holland - Cinematographer - Los Angeles
    ________________________________
    phfx.com IMDB

    Scarlet-X #316 "Skully"
    Data Sheets and Notes: Epic M & X, Scarlet X & Red Dragon
    Red Quick Reference Guide (link to 52MB PDF)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #57  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Toronto / Chicago
    Posts
    156
    Thanks Phil as I suspected and I feel the same .. less in front of the lens the better. Love the idea of the combo filters but I guess thats a commitment to the full set.
    Scarlet #2291, Pix240
    DanaDolly
    tedparkes@rogers.com
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #58  
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    30
    Thanks Phil, I have been reading and researching which IRND Filter to get, it's been weeks and the more I read the more confused I was, until I saw your reviews.
    Now I just ordered Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filter, and I feel relaxed for once.
    Thanks again!

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Holland View Post
    Yeah. That's weird isn't it? I was waiting on some folks to publish that test a while ago. I've mentioned it on Reduser elsewhere, but......

    After extensive (and boy do I mean extensive) testing I can recommend two IR/ND solutions for Mysterium-X sensors.


    They are:

    - Tiffen Hot Mirror IRND Filters - (filmtools link)
    - Formatt Hot Mirror/Neutral Density Filers - (B&H link)

    The Tiffens come in the range of 0.3-2.1. The Formatts go from 0.3-2.4.

    As of this day, 04/23/2013, the Tiffen HMIRND provide the "best" possible image out of camera with the Mysterium-X under daylight and tungsten. The Formatts are close though and a bit cheaper for the set.

    I had a full set of Formatt HMND filters in 77mm screw on and 4x5.65. The 77mm work well on still lenses. My Formatts 4x5.65s were magically transported away from me recently. At the end of next week I'm ordering a range of Tiffen HMIRND glass.


    Dragon Thoughts: The new Red Dragon sensor and bodies will have enhanced IR protection through a new IR-OLPF design. Once I have a Dragon in my hand I will test literally everything all over again. It's said that we may not need IR protection due to the new tech, but until the testing is done we can't know for sure. For Dragon we'll likely be looking for filtration needs in the 0.03-3.0 range, which is nice because the Motion Mount covers exactly that range and everything in between. I'm sure the IR-OLPF will help or solve the IR pollution (or perhaps some combination of the new color science may assist with this). Where I'm concerned is deep filtration like 1.8-3.0.

    Expect some fairly thorough tests again soon.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts