November 30th Announcement Feedback - Page 74

Lillian JC Chan · 12-01-2009, 02:53 PM

How awesome was the snapshot still just posted?! (in the forum: Recon: November 30 Update)

Keep up the great work RED! You guys are awesome, and creating such quality products. So impressed!!

Jarred Land · 12-01-2009, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Kilgroe

I'd love to know this too. If I had to guess, I'm thinking 7.5 - 60mm.

Close.. we will release a detailed spec/comparison sheet of the lineup soon.

Remember, We changed alot of features and specs over the last while beefing up the Scarlets so it will take us a while to put them all together.

ScottyC · 12-01-2009, 02:53 PM

Jarred/Jim/or RED team,
Any idea what the crop factor would be on the 2/3" Scarlet for Canon Lenses? Just wondering...

Clint Lealos · 12-01-2009, 02:54 PM

I personally think it would be worth the inconvenience at the airport to have another great "Look how ridiculous TSA is!" story. I almost want someone to question why my camera says "Bomb" on it. I may even write Bomb on my toothbrush just to see what happens:) Seriously, what's the worst thing that can happen? They x-ray it and see its actually not a bomb. Problem solved.

Jarred Land · 12-01-2009, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roberto Lequeux

Yes, Peter was asking how he'll be able to use his current Red One accessories as they said we would be able to several times. The Red Drives and the Red RAM which are larger. A module that were able to take these inside would be thick.

Maybe the answer is the IO module, and Jarred might have had a typo in all the rush that Red headquarters must be in nowadays.

There is a very thin module with a Drive port on it available for people to use existing drives... it's not the standard IO module :)

Peter Majtan · 12-01-2009, 02:56 PM

Either way this makes it a little more complicated. Now it appears that the only way to get a super-light-weight setup will be to separate the module(s) from the camera via the planed "umbilical" connection. But how can I feel disappointed with all the other GOOD NEWS...

Peter

Jarred Land · 12-01-2009, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter Majtan

Either way this makes it a little more complicated. Now it appears that the only way to get a super-light-weight setup will be to separate the module(s) from the camera via the planed "umbilical" connection. But how can I feel disappointed with all the other GOOD NEWS...

Peter

you lost me there...

Stuart English · 12-01-2009, 02:57 PM

Quote:

A little off-topic, but how does the EVF play with eyeglasses? I can't see worth beans without my glasses, so taking them off to look through the viewfinder isn't really an option for me. I'm trying to visualize a glasses lens against the EVF rubber without getting all smudgy & distorted ;)

RED's electronic viewfinders RED-EVF / Bomb-EVF have a pretty wide range diopter adjustment. So you my be O.K there.

Peter Majtan · 12-01-2009, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarred Land

There is a very thin module with a Drive port on it available for people to use existing drives... it's not the standard IO module :)

Any idea how much weight will it add to the camera?

Peter

Karl Gustav H. · 12-01-2009, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScottyC

Jarred/Jim/or RED team,
Any idea what the crop factor would be on the 2/3" Scarlet for Canon Lenses? Just wondering...

Stolen from Jason Wingroves twitter.

...between 2/3" and Super-35 cine is 2.5X between 2/3" and FF35 stills is 3.76

12-01-2009, 02:53 PM	#731
Lillian JC Chan Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: New York City, USA Posts: 3	How awesome was the snapshot still just posted?! (in the forum: Recon: November 30 Update) Keep up the great work RED! You guys are awesome, and creating such quality products. So impressed!! __________________ Film Producer, Writer Lilybana.com

12-01-2009, 02:53 PM	#733
ScottyC Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Posts: 58	Jarred/Jim/or RED team, Any idea what the crop factor would be on the 2/3" Scarlet for Canon Lenses? Just wondering... __________________ By over-estimating your problems, you under-estimate your ability to overcome them.

12-01-2009, 02:54 PM	#734
Clint Lealos Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 15	I personally think it would be worth the inconvenience at the airport to have another great "Look how ridiculous TSA is!" story. I almost want someone to question why my camera says "Bomb" on it. I may even write Bomb on my toothbrush just to see what happens:) Seriously, what's the worst thing that can happen? They x-ray it and see its actually not a bomb. Problem solved. __________________ Clint Lealos Director of Photography

12-01-2009, 02:56 PM	#736
Peter Majtan REDuser Sponsor Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Japan, USA, New Zealand Posts: 1,891	Either way this makes it a little more complicated. Now it appears that the only way to get a super-light-weight setup will be to separate the module(s) from the camera via the planed "umbilical" connection. But how can I feel disappointed with all the other GOOD NEWS... Peter __________________ You don't need eyes to see, You need a vision!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode